The Heavy Stuff

The last time The Heavy Stuff wrote about Ufo’s was at the 200 day anniversary of the incident at O’Hare Airport on Nov. 7th of 2006 — The Heavy Stuff called it `O’Hare, 200 days and Fading’. And now, one day from the year anniversary of the `non-event’ - it seems a fitting time for a review of the `affair’.

I say the words `non-event’ for a reason - because basically, that was the conclusion of the FAA about the incident. According to the FAA’s denial one could say that a `non-circular, non-gray, non-solid object with non-space was seen in a non-location above a gate of the airport - hovering below the solid cloudbank - and - that the non-object occupied real reality until it shot up and the non-object poked a hole in the clouds’.  You see, the FAA has denied that an object was seen or that an object poked a hole in the clouds - the event - simply - didn’t occur.

OR, you could believe the witnesses.  Here’ a link with a video to one of the NOW FAMOUS situations that arose when the FAA denied the existence of the event at all — http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case958.htm – yes, this is ONE of the occasions within THIS YEAR that CNN interviewed these witnesses (workers at the airport) IN SILOUETTE. Darken, without showing their faces.

The Heavy Stuff asks you —- in this world of supposed extreme terror and unbalance on nearly every level — have you seen anyone ELSE interviewed in silhouette this year? Even once? The answer is NO. ONLY this raises to the level of witness protection.

The lesson is this - folks who blow the cover of the government on UFO’s can expect the need for witness protection. And, in this case why not. An object hovered in sight, in restricted airspace, over one of the busiest airports in the country. The obvious answer being one of two very unpleasant choices for the media to speculate about - either an advanced non human race or object was HERE - or - a group of humans here on Earth has access to technology our government doesn’t admit to having.

NO wonder that the media felt the witnesses needed protection - either of the outcomes outlined above — which, if enunciated by the media in detail - would change the world perspective about `who’s in control’. But, alas, we all didn’t have to worry at all. Instead, The O’Hare Ufo Incident will go down as the new textbook way the government will deal with these `obvious’ incidents. The answer; deny the event happened. End of story.

One can hope that perhaps tomorrow, on the anniversary, that the rumored video of the event will surface and shut up the naysayers. But, The Heavy Stuff doubts it. More likely there will be NO coverage by the media, even CNN (after all, Britney may be flashing her panties again and that is indeed news to be covered). More likely, the paranormal talk shows and websites will be alone in their `coverage’.

Finally, earlier this year THS (The Heavy Stuff) speculated that it would take another `obvious’ UFO event before the media ventured into the arena again. Indeed, THS, speculates that ONLY a LIVE Ufo event will force a change in the government nay-say position. THS has speculated that a UFO hovering over a Nascar event or anywhere long enough to be on live national news is the only chance for an honest answer from the government about UFOs’s.

The question - would the news-producer who decided to put the coverage on live be provided witness protection?
 

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 6th, 2007 at 11:42 am and is filed under FAA, O'Hare Ufo Incident, Interviewed In Silhouette, Witness Protection, NASCAR, Paranormal Talk Shows, Big Lie, Ufo's, Big Media, Disclosure Politics, Alien Self-Disclosure, Aliens, CNN, UFO Incidents. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.