Please excuse it disappearing. I changed the blog address and it disappeared from Google.

I am glad you enjoyed the read. My next book will be out on Amazon maybe in about two months. I have included techniques that are very old using fire, light, shadows and plants simultaneously.

I would like to send you a PDF file of the book before it is published but I can’t see your contact details on this site. You can contact me via email at info@parallelperception.com

At the moment I am in Central America and now revealing more of the system that was taught to me by my benefactors. It is called Quetzalcoatl. It involves movement and moon-gazing techniques.

If you would like to see how these moon gazing techniques appear to the perceiver you can go to my website and read Leia’s account: http://www.parallelperception.com/2009/08/30/the-naguals-double/.html

There will be more secrets revealed about the double, it’s function in terms of the year 2012 and the hidden secrets of the third eye’s capacity in terms of its compartmentalization to act within multiples within this living construct. I am one of the first to be privileged to obtain this state of awareness and when my students learn the Jaguar Series this is also obtained by them. Thus we progress communally.

I have to tell you both about something that happened last night. As for some background, my wife is a pragmatist, a “realist” etc who is a wonderful balance to myself. She asked is if I wanted to sit outside for a bit, so we did. The sky was full of heat lightning. What was bizarre and she “witnessed” as well was what sounded like a very low flying 747, only a tone lower that however seemed stationary and came from no particular direction. Then this sound went up several tones slowly over a course of ten seconds or so, while not “moving” Then it went back down the scale for another ten seconds, again not moving, it seemed everywhere and nowhere. We looked at each other with a ?. “That was no jet” she said. I laughed and said, “Well for once, it’s not just me..”

Rick I think your idea is brilliant..count on me to join.

As far as my peripheral vision of the future, I think it is here but we don’t recognize an emerging pattern among ourselves,which resemble clues that are personal and yet they are not. Call them trans-personal and I don’t mean this in a philosophic mode, although it enters realm this realm as well as in many others more attuned to sensory anomalies. For now, I will leave it at that rather than getting long winded.

Best to you both.

J.S. - or, should I call you Strother? (LOL) - First, of course you opened a book to heavy words that nearly exactly fits the subject at hand - what else is new. That said, it is very close - as you know - to my thoughts on the whole matter. That said - I do want to respond with my slightly different take on the book words. ———– My real feelings are getting closer to what I said to Bruce above. — When we are an infant and child - I think we slowly build up a `flowing’ understanding of our surroundings of objects - IE: what they are, do they move, what are they for, will it be in the same place tomorrow - and that slow build-up which generally comes from our parents and just our presense in the world - allows us to manuveur about the world outside of our space-body and to provide the `real and reel’ of our experience. As humans, (as opposed to animals that are walking and independent sometimes in moments after birth) - I think we are given, obviously, much more time to understand our surroundings and mind and body. Eventually, as we become human as a child - our ontology becomes to understand the common consensus we are presented with - forming our view of the world and the learning of how our actions are TIED to those `outside objects’. Indeed, I feel our perceived `freewill’ is related to how we understand that we can `do things with other objects’.

Now, here’s my BUT to the book stuff you related - I don’t think that our human form is `misinterpreting’ what we see. The objects of our reality are in my opinion `really there’. Now, that said, I do believe we are tied into a human form or understanding what we see or can see. And, that that human form can have many early influences that may allow it to `see’ things not of the common consensus. At least possibly. I intend to re-read this stuff from Lujan Mathus soon as his words seemed very close to how we might `arrange’ time for our understanding.

Next you ask: The question I would like to pose is: What is our collective peripheral vision as a culture? — (Bruce, J.S. has incredible, NO - AMAZING peripheral vision - that partly could be a result of his mind being folded by being a professional Juggler) My guess-answer J.S. is that no `collective’ peripheral vision exists - as I feel all perception sturctures are also tied to the individual - that said, I could be wrong and the Noosphere perhaps extends into perception also.

Next you ask: What is your own peripheral vision? Does that vision extend beyond the “naked eye”? Who determines the extent of that vision? —- I feel my own PV is `normalish’ — that obviously there is data beyond the `naked eye’ - that I will concede may be affected by our expectations in our own `perception structure’ - and that the `who’ who determines it - is 95% me and 5% `the collective’ (or some such ratio) - or 9,999 - 1.

Finally, yes, as always - GREAT WORDPLAY on be here now. Expect nothing less from you. and Lastly, — thanks for your backpat on sending your mind in a particular direction - I appreciate that you are happy for that and not mad. And, THE MAN is a compliment. Your own extensions of the inner into the outer need more print on the internet.

Now, —– Bruce — of course, thanks for your articulate and heavy response. I am hoping that you will continue this with some of my follow up comments and my questions about your words.

`It made me rethink the big bang theory as well as a beginning middle and end theory that leaves out the variegation’s of space\time as sort of an obvious disclaimer. Terrence McKenna’s metaphor of the UFO phenomenon as an “onion” seems apt.’ —– Working in reverse - Terrence McKenna is one of J.S.’s favorites and one I give some significant credence to. I will relent to the idea that that phenomenology we are under is so - seemingly obvious - that discounting the variegation’s of the time cone is done nearly all including those into the paranormal. That said, the way my mind works - with my three definitions that `fit’ the sensations - I really feel it IS that basic and we work up from there.———- And, like the big bang theory (of which I love Guth and once even corresponded with him) I think it is the `defintions’ of space and time via phenomenology that would underlie the physics. —– Next points by you my mind responds to.

`There are many tantalizing but ultimately unprovable personal anomalies that appear to indicate I was part of that motley bunch that fled the Revolution with G, but frankly, this, of course, means very little to me as it is an abstraction and a distraction at the same time.’ ———— Please elaborate about the unprovable personal anomalies.
I recently had a extra dimensional dream which I have not written about that was very blunt inasmuch as the message was I do not know what I am tampering with by rearranging the furniture. End of message. I suppose it was a warning, one from myself? My intuition says yes but my intellect says no and that is simply the way it is these days.’ —- J.S. has dimensional dreams on occasion that he relates to me - often ending in very profound statements. And, as you may know, I was able to use Castaneda’s techniques in the 70’s and occasionally since to absolutely experience Controlled Lucid Dreaming - which I consider one of the strangest perceptual states I’ve ever experienced.

`Have you noticed the entrainment of the wave of computer generated realities with natural disasters, which seems to be occurring? There seems to a major disturbance in the information field like a persistent leak under a basement where the hydraulic pressure of some other “influence” is building. ‘ ———— No, tell me more. Interesting.

And, thank you sir for your backpat too.

I swear - would could get another `head or two’ for this discussion and rival anything available (I know J.S. has another buddy who he calls my doppelganger - I bet you do Bruce too - and heck, we could invite bloggers like D.B. Donlon, Eric Stitt, Micheal Presscot, and perhaps a couple of others — investigators/powerplayers like Lon Strickler, Patrick Hughye, Rick Stokes and a few others you guys can think of)on the internet.

Don’t put it past me to start a blog with the three of us and others previously mentioned which is NOTHING but our comments about our own ideas. A chance to put G.’s - C level influences more available to others and to ourselves.

Finally, I look forward to each of your follow-up’s.

Rick (HRP)

I read childhood development theories, which are really placed into a global context in Rodney Collins very under appreciated work, which was very influential to me, as a student of Ouspensky, he wrote “The Theory of Celestial Influence” posthumously. A terrific book.

There are many tantalizing but ultimately unprovable personal anomalies that appear to indicate I was part of that motley bunch that fled the Revolution with G, but frankly, this, of course, means very little to me as it is an abstraction and a distraction at the same time. The ego as a defense mechanism is such a dangerous snake. I recently had a extra dimensional dream which I have not written about that was very blunt inasmuch as the message was I do not know what I am tampering with by rearranging the furniture. End of message. I suppose it was a warning, one from myself? My intuition says yes but my intellect says no and that is simply the way it is these days. The more I dig around, the more I distrust my own intellect, and the more I trust my intuition, which counter-intuitive at the level upon which I write. I have been thinking about Mac Tonnies a lot lately and how he bent the rules of fiction and science which was a sort of humanist commentary on our existential age. Have you noticed the entrainment of the wave of computer generated realities with natural disasters, which seems to be occurring? There seems to a major disturbance in the information field like a persistent leak under a basement where the hydraulic pressure of some other “influence” is building. My lost friend we discussed ( who shall remain nameless here) had an uncanny knack for predicting “waves” of this sort of thing, all of which I have no idea what they represent although I sense a post selective process as I wrote about in a vague sort of way in the post you mention, as if a rip is about to tear across our dreams, not in a emotional sense but in a very odd manner. Please folks, no apocalypse inferred. A great post of yours ignited this thread!

I didn’t know anything about ET’s until recently when I read a book by Jean Eisenhower called “Rattlesnake Fire”. Up until then, I thought that aliens were just a strange archetypal anomaly that some traumatized people were tuned into. After reading JE’s book, I realized that there was much more to it, and since then, although I want to leave this subject alone, I find myself looking into it more and more.
I want to leave it alone, because I’m afraid that people who are too interested might attract either alien, or CIA attention. Also it frightens me.

Anyway, this particular page seemed well-informed on the shocking and completely insane subject of Americans being teleported to Mars for goodness sake!! and so I have registered with Heavy Stuff and will undoubtedly sit in front of my computer looking into whatever else we have here.
How many different people are writing these blogs?
LAF

I’d be very interested in hearing of your non-consensus experiences too and hope you detail them and your interpretation in another comment (or two).

You might even like my Phenomenoloy blog (all of four posts) at http://whatisnotabletonotbeis.blogspot.com .

Again, thanks.
Rick Phillips

Very good material you’ve written here, what the world needs is a lot more skeptical but open-minded technoshamans.