The Heavy Stuff

Hello, and welcome back to today’s edition of The Heavy Stuff (THS) - today’s topic - the promise of UFO’s in the skies for 72 hours. Yes, believe it or not, a group calling itself The Federation of Light is predicting that next month, for 72 hours, UFO’s will hang in our Earths skies to prove they exist - and to propel earthlings into a new consciousness.

As you probably know, THS has a UFO website dealing directly with Ufo Disclosure www.ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com and only last month we detailed that The Olympics, a world event, would seem to be a natural time for purposeful UFO disclosure should `the aliens’ want to give earthlings that `needed proof’. And, of course, the aliens did not show up.

Regardless, that hasn’t stopped the Federation of Light (FOL) from predicting that Oct 08 is the timeframe for the long predicted, some would say hoped for, event. It is in uncertain times like this that many would seek for someone, something, to have the answers to all of humanities problems - and the FOL is hardly the first to predict the aliens will choose to `show themselves’.

The interesting thing of interest to THS when first reading this was the commonalities the prediction had with a particular man called Prophet Yahweh just over three years ago. If you don’t remember that, the Prophet, who claimed to have `called spaceships’ over 1,500 times - was being interviewed live on a Las Vegas TV station when he indeed appeared to `call a spaceship’ after a prayer. The TV reporter seemed astonished - here’s that link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fMcvAvrjmA - it’s 1:58 of video that will amaze you.

As you saw, the TV station picked the time and place for the `calling’ and after the prayer indeed a `orb’ or `light’ appeared in the sky and was recorded on video. The result of that exposure made Prophet Yahweh an instant celebrity and he boldly predicted that he would be able to call the `spaceships’ for 72 hours over the coming July 4th holiday. It was that 3 day guarantee that caught THS’s attention with this new claim by the FOL.

Obviously, UFO’s didn’t sit over the Vegas skies in 2005 for three days, and therefore the Prophet faded from public interest. However of interest was that THS (meaning the editor of THS, before THS existence) exchanged a number of e-mails with the Prophet. Below is an excerpt of one of those e-mails from our files:

In my opinion, you certainly have earned the right to reveal what you
have researched and what you believe to be important. I know that
because you say that Yahweh provides you these `events’ you believe
the voice in your head as you see the visable outcome (and so do
others). This is indeed beyond what even a David Blaine has been able
to do as far as suspend others beliefs as to what is possible.

Have you hit up Ted Serios yet on Google?

Sir; I ask you to consider that I MAY BE RIGHT as to why the
SUMMONING events occur at your `command’ (or Yahweh’s). You have, in
whatever manner, been able to generate what I’d like to call `a
tangible belief’ that `becomes an event’ — that is then `able to be
videotaped’. Sir; I beg your indulgence to consider that what occurs
MAY have a basis in reality that at best is only partially related to
`Yahweh’ but 100% connected to you. All thru your beliefs and
intentionalities which `set up’ moments of `tangible phenomena’ which
is `transient in nature’. I’m sorry to say — that very unique
ability may have nothing to do with religion at all —— or this
whole business about `which religion is right or wrong’.

That said, you are indeed a challenge to the `power structure’ –
especially if your focus is JUST getting the idea of Yahweh across.
After all, their beliefs don’t have someone doing the impossible for
the cameras.

In some of THS’s early posts we speculated that what actually is being `put into the skies’ or may being seen in the skies — are what is commonly called `orbs’ — but what THS refers to as `Tulpa’s’. THS literally believes that it is possible to `set up’ `consciousness balls’ for viewing - but that the Tulpas only have `so much energy’ and eventually `fade out’. (Which is why none hang in the skies for days on end.)

Which brings us back to the FOL claims about the upcoming event they predict. Once again, we see an attempt to `set up expectations’ about 50 days in advance of THE BIG EVENT. It makes one wonder that if the FOL’s point of view is disseminated enough - and has enough `believers’ - that perhaps some sort of an event may occur.

For example, would it be possible that `while sleeping’ enough of these worldwide believers could somehow summon a common `lucid dream’  of a UFO in the sky? And, that IF it happened the `belief’ would `grow’ into an ongoing event? ———– Don’t hold your breath.

No, instead, like all the endtimers before them, those who predict a certain date, in the future, for ANY event - are nearly certain to be disappointed. Indeed, it’s much like believing the words of a used car salesman and his promise of a 72 hour guarantee.

Thanks for reading. Make sure to bookmark and return often. You can find that FOL link on my anomalies site dated Sept. 5th at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman or if you want UFO videos and more go to our other site www.squidoo.com/anomalies.

The Empty Space of Bootes Void

Hello fans of The Heavy Stuff (THS) thanks for returning for a dose of speculations about the reality structure - speculations on realities greatest mysteries. Even mysteries such as freewill and determinism — time travel — consciousness — and the possibilitiy of an `afterlife’ for entities with consciousness. Entities like you, yourself. Possibilities that may depend on the actual workings of the reality structure itself - the phenomenology of the structure of actualization.

Anyhow, as you know, this blog often talks about links  posted daily on our anomalies blog on Squidoo.com. Recently, we moved a science link from the anomalies lens on www.Squidoo.com/anomalyman  to our `best of 2006 & 2007′ anomalies website at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman2006 about an area of the observable universe that is the `emptiest’ void that we can observe from Earth.

The `empty space’ is called Bootes Void and represents about 2% of the observable universe from our viewpoint. The article goes on at great length (and we once again encourage you to hit the link to find the original article - you will like the Anomalies of 2006/2007) to indicate just `how empty’ this `empty space’ is — giving  great `facts’ —  for example; that if the Earth was in the area of the Bootes Void that earthling scientists “wouldn’t have known of another galaxy” -  other than ours - until the 1960’s. Amazing.

The article also gives other `facts’ about the `amount’ of `material’ in the actual universe — which it turns out is about an average of one atom per cubic meter of `space’. THS has read this figure before in other articles and it gives one pause as to just how rare REAL SPACE with atoms actually is. You know, THINGS, LIKE YOU AND ME. It turns out that WE are Rare spaces. Rare Real Space.  Amazing, even, `Living Space’.

All this talk in the article  set me thinking upon my favorite subject - phenomenology. Phenomenology deals with fundamentals like `spaces’ and `times’. Phenomenology deals with fundamentals like `present’ `past’ and `future’ — all of which it turns out - apply to things like us - rare spaces in the universe. Spaces that actually have space . At least space as humans usually consider it. And, that perhaps these rare spaces even have `time’. (Or, something liketime.)

Indeed, perhaps it’s best to begin with at least one definition of `the past’ by one of the world’s best thinkers about such subject matter - Sartre. To quote Sartre from page 280 of Being And Nothingness
 
      “The `this’ does not appear as a present which later will have to become past and which before that was future…. The moment I perceive it already exists in the three temporal dimensions” 

And, that is what The Heavy Stuff would like to speculate about some more - our perception - and its relation to space and to time -  and  even our relationship to reality. But, The Heavy Stuff would like to say a few more words about that one atom per cubic yard of `space’ — remember how `empty’ that atom is?

Remember, science tells us that the `space’ (distance) between sub-atomic particles is immense. Literally. So, that `occupied space’ of one atom per cubic yard is actually even more `empty’ of `real mass’ - real space. As the reader of The Heavy Stuff probably knows, sciences  current assumption is that there is some sort of  `kernel’ of real space at the core of the subatomic divisions.

Perhaps yes, perhaps no.

And, what does science say `fills’ the rest of this `empty space’ – THE ANSWER IS (we are told) is that virtual particles fill that space - `virtual spaces; form the broth of reality.

And, what do we know about OUR perceiving space that we `call’ our own consciousness — well, we know from the study of physics that everything we see represented in the now actually has already occurred and IS in the determined past -  that is - to our own perceiving `now’ eyes. The fact is - light simply `takes time’ (obviously, this duration is a representation of the `running off’ space) to reach us - from everything - even the light reflecting from our own body parts. Indeed, the only `thing’ that we can truly refer to as present is our own `now’ of perception.

(Now, this is not a regress into infinity. The `other spaces’ we see and are in close `space association with’ :ie: the clock on the wall, one’s spouse, the computer, your rock collection – are not only REAL in every sense of the word – just like we are real – THEY ARE THE ONLY SPACES THAT GIVE US LOCAL location and DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT – which is key to the feeling of realness at the human level. The other spaces provide our freewill TO US.)

Think about it.

The things we see - other people and objects - have predetermined spaces to offer for our perception - in exactly pre-determined points of space — and all these spaces have reference to each other - in addition to a relation with our perception of their space. Those spaces, to THS, have the overriding characteristic of being NOT ABLE TO BE -  they are unchangeable as they arrive at our perception. They are the `run-off’ of their actual `now’ spaces that they experience and are experiencing.

Yes,  IT IS TRUE, `future’ `now’s’ to us — determined future now’s — are also part of our `real present’  — we just can’t see them the `split moment’ into the future that they occupy already. Just before they `run off’ the phenomena source. The space.

Remember the Sartre quote above - `spaces’ ARRIVE with a past, a present, and a future, — only by thinking of spaces as a phase transition – gets one on-track to right thinking about this phenomenology. Specifically, The Heavy Stuff’s phenomenology positions that the Not-able-to-be transcends into an Able-to-not-be ——- literally, the space transforming into a timelike space that represents the spaces location `in reality’ (our own light reflection) — in an `area of common able-to-not-be spaces’ — that `when they combine by the FACT that real spaces are having real proximity’ CREATES A `TIMELINE’ OF NOT-ABLE-TO-NOT-BE’S. (Really, it’s a `space-line’.) What we all commonly think of as reality.

So, `Spaces’ first characteristic is having no beingness (ie; space’s defining attribute being Not able to be. Then, Space’s second characteristic is it’s runoff representation – the able to not be (part) of space. This is a (the) part of space that is `seen’ by consciousness’s within reality (as we have NO access to the real space of an object, seeing only the runoff light).

The last characteristic of space is that the able-to-not-be `runs off’ on `other spaces run off’ forming our real itself. (In a sense, reality is two steps from `the real now’ we as a space possess).

At this point, I’d like to draw the attention of readers of The Heavy Stuff to the nebulousness of `real’. IF the only reality that has freewill , the real real that is `with us’ only so to speak – that certainly elevates our thoughts as something directly connected to REAL. To real freewill space. Even if `thoughts’ are a `different’ type of space – they have that as an undeniable unique attribute.

Whereas, the space of our `runoff’ – being `one step beyond’ the `original space’ (even if being identical, simply having all the coordinates the `real one’ lacked) may not have that tangible connection that mind has with the real space we represent. Indeed, our runoff space – can’t move, can’t change, can’t do anything. Yet, it is our human spaces representation to reality itself. Can `things’ be this quirky? Apparently.

Then, finally, we see the moment, the space, and it is not the same as the not able to be representation we already are. The not able to not be vanishes behind a new runoff of not able to be representing real.  For more understanding of THS’s phenomenology go to www.whatisnotabletonotbeis.blogspot.com  - it’s at this blog that you can answer the fantastic question, What can be changed — the future, the past, the now, nothing, or everything. Quite a question, don’t you think?

When one looks at a reality structure that may be this basic in description – the possibility that `other types of spaces’ and `other types of real’s’ may indeed exist  - and may be perceivable – seems more plausible.  After all, we humans seem to be able to distinguish these `space phases’.

As readers of The Heavy Stuff know from previous posts, THS speculates that when a human dies (or any consciousness dies) it’s mind-space continues to occur – continues to have some representation in the able to not be (of spaces) (virtual spaces). On occasion, these not able to be `spaces’ could even `express’ (actualize) as a duration themselves.

Interestingly, these virtual spaces, the able to not be’s, (the times outside of spaces) present as a space when they occur - and this could be the very definition of anomalous phenomena. Able to not be’s expressing as not able to be’s.

These `virtual spaces’ could even be human consciousness spaces called tulpas – created by living humans (see several of my posts on Tulpas on this site, or find all my posts on www.squidoo.com/theheavystuff )———– or —— orbs — very small representations of `spaces’ NOT made by living humans – but, possibly representing a portion of one’s consciousness after death.

Or, the most dramatic of all doppelganger’s (while alive) or the full appearance of a `Ghost’ (when dead)  (the ultimate representation of this being the pilots of eastern flight 401). All of these phenomena represent an aspect of `real space’ — phenomena with origins in the able to not be space of reality.

NOTE however, these are not spaces with a connection of a REAL not able to be space within reality represented by atoms.  Which could be why all these etheral, esoteric, fleeting phenomena — don’t last within reality.

Has all this been heavy enough for you? THS would love to read your comments - nothing is too far out when commenting about phenomena. Or empty space.

It’s only in the last few years that THS has really become aware of Tulpas and the possibility that Tulpas may explain certain types of fortean events. Indeed, once in awhile other blog posts speculate in the same manner. This will be the focus of this Heavy Stuff.

As most readers of THS (The Heavy Stuff) know, this blog supports our Anomalies, ParaNormal, and Mind Perceptions website on Squidoo.com — and that site has a small daily listing of esoteric(like) links — similar to great websites like www.thedailygrail.com and www.anomalist.com . Interestingly, this link http://www.binnallofamerica.com/gm1.22.8.html is also written by a woman who has a website of anomalies links like those above (she also has other blogs) and mine — we share common interests obviously - and it’s of interest that tulpas are one of them. Perhaps, only goofy editors like THS, Leslie, Rick Stokes of anomalist.com and others who run similar sites have an interest in such `esoteric’ explanations - but - here is THS’s `take’ - once again - on Tulpas.

First, some words to provide a basis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulpa for this discussion.

Tulpas have been associated with Tibetan mysticism - and seem `to be’ - thoughtforms — generated by human consciousness — and that some of these `created spaces’ can take on an extended `life’ (time) with intentionality’s. So, again, consciousness, creating a space, that has `time’/duration — and may - by existing — produce independent intentionality’s.

Believe it or not, in the pre-hype of the Prophet Yahweh controversy a few years back THS’s writer had direct e-mail exchanges with the Prophet. If you are not familar with P.Y. he claimed that he had been `calling spaceships’ into the sky for decades and that he was going to call one to hover in the Las Vegas skies for 45 days straight — thereby enlightening the world about `flying saucers’ and his particular powers to call these ships. P.Y. indeed, had the incredible ability to `call’ one of these orbs `on-demand’ when interviewed by a local Las Vegas station on live TV — causing the reporter to be astonished and the gov’t to deny having anything on radar, etc.

What happened, or was shown on TV, was a `light’ suddenly being in the sky way way up — and this `light’ started moving rapidly and seemingly independently — all the while picked up by the video camera and described by the excited reporter. However, because of THS’s interest in Ufo’s, we had already been aware of another gentleman out in California who would `go out daily’ and `film ufo’s’ — all he had to do was set up his video camera, wait, and look into the sky and vo-la — there was a `ufo’. (His `ufo’s’ would also last for a few minutes but fade away eventually too. Like P.Y.’s did.) To, THS, these two events seemed totally similar. This THS writer contacted P.Y. — and told him of the California guy `doing’ the same thing — BUT — NOT claiming that HE himself was `doing’ it — like P.Y.  was claiming.

But, being inquisitive and seeking connections - eventually yielded the information on Tulpas to THS. The revelation was that Tulpas fit exactly what P.Y. was able to `do’ — it seemed that years of prayer had indeed somehow seemed to fuse his consciousness with enough `belief’ / `power’ - that he indeed was able to project a `conscious space’ into existence. The same is true for the guy out filming daily in California — he built the belief daily too - just like P.Y. — only he couldn’t fully believe it was a representation of him and his beliefs that it would happen.

Now, to some of Leslie’s points and speculations - and other points too. First, THS agrees that tulpas are mis-identified as `UFO’s’ — after all - both are `lights in the sky’. Both are `light spaces’. Both move in the sky. Not only that, some `lights in the sky’ seemingly transform into solid objects. That said, THS’s thinks Tulpas and `lights that turn into UFO’s’ are  two different phenomena.

First, Tulpas are said to be `independent’ once created by a human. Therefore, THS thinks the speculation that folks watching a Tulpa could transform it into a UFO to be misguided. Tulpas simply seem to move, perhaps with intention and last a few minutes. Then disappear. Tulpas, light spaces, do not have the energy to continue indefinitely or transform because of their limited duration. It’s why P.Y. could not put one in the sky for 45 days — it’s why — when a Tulpa is observed in the sky — that it fades eventually, regardless of how many may be observing it. (Point being, energy is not being supplied by human consciousness after formation in THS opinion.)

THS has also pointed out the seeming overlap of Tulpas and Orbs. It seems that orbs are little more than Tulpas NOT in the sky — but - near the ground. Therefore, Tulpas and Orbs may indeed be the same phenomena — once again, orbs don’t last indefinitely — or transform into things (at least not too often, lol). Indeed, they seem very similar. BUT, THS would like to provide another explanation for `balls of light’ `balls of light that have space’ — and that is — Orbs - could be `dead beings’.

THS will say it again; Orbs could be the literal materialization of `beingness’ after death. Perhaps the highest state that an enlightened person who dies can archive is `being an Orb’. Literally becoming a `light being’ contained within that luminous ball. `Living’ somewhere in the virtual particles that constitute most of the reality structure. Perhaps on occasion having the power `to display’ or on occasion `displaying’ when `called’ by folks thinking esoteric thoughts.

But, THS would draw the line on Tulpas molding into some quasi-real object — such as a UFO without `real gadgets or workings’. That stated Leslie, what a cool concept - worthy of a science fiction storyline.

The Heavy Stuff does not think authorities are finding semi-quasi-real Tulpa objects — that are not able to be explained. That said, Tulpas, as Leslie stated — may be behind some things esoteric. Like Ufo sightings and Orb sightings.

Please visit the blogroll sites — and thanks for making the unique visitor count the highest ever this month @13,000 of you — thanks again.

To the thinking individual, several `paranormal’ phenomena are beginning to seem to have the same `origin’ or `ontology’ - (ontology is defined as a branch of metaphysics concerned with the nature and relations of being — or — a particular theory about the nature of being or the kinds of existent). Specifically, I am referring to the `spaces’ or descriptions of Tulpas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtform (best described by the previous wiki link), Orbs, and Zooforms — to which, this link is the best description http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/neil-arnold-the-interview/ . Sorry for taking you thru so much background links for this posting — but, this subject matter is not mainstream media like Bigfoot or Ufo’s — and my assumption is that many need to brush up on their understanding as to how these phenomena are described.

As regular readers know, The Heavy Stuff loves to position phenomenology as critical to understanding `strange phenomena’. Just as Einstein’s love of thought produced the simple equation E=MC(squared) — phenomenology also reduces `appearances’ and `phenomena’ to the most basic look at reality. To The Heavy Stuff, that means taking our reality right `down’ to its basic components of space and time (or what we call time). The Heavy Stuff has been positioning that those `words’ (space/time) — our most basic constitution of being — can be `described’ using some ontological terms.

The Heavy Stuff’s most complete description of the word `space’ can be found at the blog - http://whatisnotabletonotbe.blogspot.com — simply put — just as John Paul Sartre had words for space - time - and being — so does The Heavy Stuff. Whereas Sartre used concepts such as Being In Itself, Being For Itself and Being For Others — The Heavy Stuff has basic words to describe the biggest concepts for consciousness - namely, space - time - and - existence.

Specifically, The Heavy Stuff’s `concept’ for the very idea of `space’ - is that `Space’ IS —> NOT ABLE TO BE . The Heavy Stuff’s `concept’ for `time’ IS —-> ABLE TO NOT BE. And, The Heavy Stuff’s `concept’ for our reality/existence IS ——–> NOT ABLE TO NOT BE … The words (not able to not be) literally meaning  `something that is determined’ — and, obviously, our reality, the one that we experience in common with others,  is determined. That is because, all spaces, but our own, `come’ to us via light waves with their `runoff’ of space. What we see as NOW is NOT NOW as it `arrives’ via a manner which `tells’ us — it has already occurred - and comes to us as pre-determined light waves of information. Having a `space’ ourselves - gives us a particular `positioning/placement’ compared to every other thing in existence with a `space’ (or mass of an object).

I know your head might be spinning if you have never encountered phenomenology before — or if you did — you just wrote it off as a lot of mumbo-jumbo. As I mentioned before, phenomenology attempts to look at the very biggest `issues’ of being. The biggest issues to being human or  to having a consciousness.

And, the equivalent to `who made God’ - for phenomenology - is, `how could time have ever begun?’ — These phenomenological concepts that I will now try to describe - go right to the very very beginning so to speak.  Indeed, The Heavy Stuff begs your indulgence for the next several paragraphs  about the beginning of the phenomenology positioning of The Heavy Stuff.

At the very `beginning’ of experience there had to be the `potential’ for `reality’ or space/time to occur. But, it was just the potential for a reality - not the expression of that reality. There would have been a `oneness’ - a `sameness’ to all - everything. OR one could say, there was an ABLE TO BE in the beginning of the eternity `before’ the reality of space/time. But, eventually, (science would have us believe it was 13.7 billion years ago) the `oneness’ of ABLE TO BE was `forced’ to `accept’ one and perhaps two simultaneous `equal concepts’. BUT, since the ABLE TO BE was/is everything — the evolution of `beingness’ — the very ABLE TO BE itself — was not violated by having a `new’ description of `everything’.

And, that `new description’ literally — was the `explosion’ of the concept of `space-time’. The ABLE TO BE evolved INTO a `thing’ that turned out to be `space’ itself - and all the physical properties that describe the mass of space and elements.  Indeed, as opposed to GOD being ABLE TO BE (everything) — the first space — was able to NOT BE GOD  (to not-be `potential’, by actualizing space) — `it’ was to be able to have the ability to be NOT ABLE TO BE — it wasn’t GOD, it wasn’t `permanent’ -  it was `something else’ a `space’. A space which was NOT ABLE TO BE. It’s very definition and `appearance’  being its representation of `the space’s’ unique identity - it’s unique singularness.

Immediately, with the `invention’ of the `new’ concept — `that original space’ - would realize its `original relation to the original space that GOD or the ABLE TO BE possessed that was `different’ in concept. THAT event would be between `two spaces’ GOD, the able to be, and Space, the NOT able to be. Suddenly, reality had volume and texture - it had a BEFORE (in the able to be) and a `NOW’ in the `space’ of the NOT ABLE TO BE.

We are, indeed, speaking metamorphically about the beginning of consciousness of course. Be it God becoming aware of its parts — or Space becoming aware that it isn’t God. As this concept `expanded’ `space’ would be aware of even more than `the before of God’ — it, space, would be aware that `other spaces than it’ COULD BE. Those `other spaces’ other than God and Space. Space becoming more than one thing (first element changing into more elements?) — a `NEW’ concept beyond the NOT ABLE TO BE.

And, indeed, that concept is ABLE TO NOT BE ———– able to not be the NOT ABLE TO BE. A `new’ space - or beingness idea. Another way for God to `express and appear’ within the ABLE TO BE furnished as the basis for everything. It could be said that the ABLE TO NOT BE is TIME (in a sense) — or — the repeating of the being of space. The whole concept of time (able to not be) GIVES `space’ `somewhere’ to BE (now). OR, the ABLE TO NOT BE is the realization that space has being - expressed as duration.

The Heavy Stuff needs one more paragraph of indulgence from the reader to explain the final combining `concept’ of the Heavy Stuff’s phenomenology. Simply put — we aren’t quite at a real reality yet via the above descriptions of space and time and god. We need the phenomenology descriptions of reality itself. AND, the combining of NOT ABLE TO BE with the ABLE TO NOT BE —— became what is considered the REAL REALITY — THE NOT ABLE TO NOT BE — the determined. The reality we all see before us right now. Basic words to describe the segments which make up the determined reality all consciousness’s experience.

It takes all of those phenomenology words to begin to describe what today’s topic might be about - the topic being the similarity of Tulpas, Zooforms and Orbs.

Wikipedia describes Zooforms (thoughtforms) with words such as these:

These are not animals at all, but entities or apparitions which adopt or seem to have (quasi)animal form. This is where we (at least to some extent) enter science fictionterritory. In many ways, these elusive and contentious entities have plagued cryptozoology since its inception, and tend to be dismissed by mainstream science as thoroughly unworthy of consideration. Zooform phenomena seem to be a strange blend of paranormal manifestation and mythology…However, Jonathan Downeswho first coined the term in 1990, maintains that many zooform phenomena result from complex psychosocial and sociological phenomena, and suggests that to classify all such phenomena as “paranormal” in origin is counterproductive…Thoughtform may be understood as a ‘psychospiritual’ complexof energy or consciousness manifested either consciously or unconsciously, by an individual or a group. Thoughtform are understood differently and take on different forms in different traditions. Stated differently, a thoughtform, is a subtle objectification that may or may not have consciousness and self-determination. Thoughtform may be benevolent, malevolent or of complex alignment and may be understood as a spontaneous or intentional manifestation from a combination of willpower, bioenergy, discipline, chi, prana and/or astral or ætherial substance

Simply put, the Zooform is a `space’ with conscious identity - which does not `appear’ `normally’. Except for the fact that Ghosts have a real person identity - as opposed to a mythical beast (which has an identity that has been imagined) — the similarities are obvious — consciousness’s that are looking for a space to appear in within what we call reality.

Now, consider how similar the words Wikipedia uses for Tulpas:

A tulpa is, in Tibetan mysticism, a being or object which is created through willpower, visualisation, attention and focus, concerted intentionality and ritual. In other words, it is a materialized thought that has taken physical form….

There are… apparitions that make public appearances. Some of these are said to be the perceptible double—the etheric counterpart—of a living person who is undergoing an out-of-body experience. Even more mysterious are the externalized perceptible manifestations of something whose existence originated in the mind of its creator by virtue of that person’s incredible powers of concentration, visualization, and other, more occult, efforts of the mind. In Tibet, where such things are practiced, a ghost of this kind is called a tulpa. A tulpa is usually produced by a skilled magician or yogi, although in some cases it is said to arise from the collective imagination of superstitious villagers, say, or of travelers passing through some sinister tract of country.— Mysteries of the Unexplained, 1990, Reader’s Digest Association Inc. page 176

Note - Zooforms described as `entities..adopting a ..form’ and Tulpas being `a being developed thru attention and focus’. Much more simply — spaces; with definition; that can become real.Indeed, you can see above that the description of Tulpa’s goes to the point of the delivery of `etheric doubles’ of humans having out-of-the-body experiences. Is this really different than doppelgangers or the pilots of the flight of Eastern 401 appearing after `death’? Isn’t a `space’ with consciousness `something’ whether it is `seen’ or even `real’? Don’t our very thoughts fit this description?

Finally, there’s Orb’s (which I have written about before on The Heavy Stuff — BTW - you can catch all of the topic in one easy place with my website www.squidoo.com/theheavystuff ) — again - here’s Wikipedia’s words: The opposing school maintains that orbs are paranormal in nature, i.e. non-naturalistic and ghost like…That orb photos can be gained anywhere has, however, been adopted into the position of conspiracy theorists who maintain that orbs are probes/devices being used by an alien culture to monitor human activities…

The Heavy Stuff knows that readers seek some bottom line - some bottom truth. The truth of these phenomena is that they are part of the `space’ spectrum. The end of the `space spectrum’ these entities exist within does not normally interact with `normal’ space - normal space with real mass. But, DOES seem to interact with the `conscious’ part of humans - the `part’ of humans that is able-to-not-be at a given moment. The `extra’ part of us all - our attention and awareness to space forms that are not our own space. While usually, this is ONLY our own thoughts (and the spaces involved with those thoughts) - our thoughts are not bound to us. Evidently, that space of us is connected to `something more’ than this reality of determined spaces. It is connected to sequences of spaces that could be interpreted as paranormal. And, evidently, when that happens — with intentionality’s from either side of space (the beyond of non-spaces and the here of real spaces) — the events can actually appear and be seen. Such as the rare Ghost appearance, such as the rare Tulpa appearance, such as the very rare appearance with `full space’ such as the pilots of Flight 401.

But, for the same reason that they appear (the ability to project the not-able-to-be space that they are) as an able-to-not-be in our reality - is the reason they `can’t continue’ and simply `pop’ out of existance  when they exhaust their own `energy’ of `showing as a space’ - as a not-able-to-be. More simply put, the able-to-not-be of our thoughts, our time, (in a sense) - `peter out’ - as they fade of `space’ - the very thoughts themselves. We create `spaces’ not-able-to-be’s — as we think. `Spaces’ that often influence how our real space moves - that seem to have a position.

But, they fade - just like human will. So too do Zooforms, Tulpas and Orbs fade - the moment they no longer have a space to influence the not able to not be. The consensus of determination does not allow for the continued existence of entities based on something other than the not-able-to-be. To exist INTO the future one (any space) must have a now AND a past — tulpas, orbs and zooforms - project INTO the present but instead of `running off’ into the future - those entities `run off’ into the past (really, they run off into the other - the able-to-not-be) not connected to the real future.

More Heavy thoughts soon - thanks for reading. Would love for you to visit my anomaly site at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman