The Heavy Stuff

Recently I had this link  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=469849&in_page_id=1879      on  my Aug. 6th posting in my www.squidoo.com/anomalymanlens (squidoo.com hosts free one page websites) - in summary, it’s about a man who became obsessed with the `glowing white orbs’ that sometimes can be seen in everyday photographs. The article goes into painstaking detail about how the gentleman became obsessed with the white dots and the methodology he used to `prove’ that orbs even had `characteristics’ - including the ability to be `called’ into a photo - and - only `appearing’ on one of two camera shots taken simultaneously. (Some say that UFO’s can be called even.) The Heavy Stuff thinks that this man makes a convincing case that `some space with intelligence’ is displaying itself to the camera shutter. But, is that intelligence that of a dead human? Please - make sure to read the story via my Anomalies, Paranormal and Mind Perceptions `lens’ hosted on Squidoo.com. and then return for the rest of the heavy thoughts.

Welcome back. Now that you have read about this mans impressive efforts to pin down the `orbs’ seen in pictures - I want to bring the discussion again to the various `proofs’ I have been blogging about concerning the survival of `death’ and the way that phenomena is being `expressed’ and then `recorded’ by our `science-technology’ of today - such as tape recorders, cameras and video cameras. After all, all that mankind is desiring is for `some aspect’ of our `life’ to continue - after death. If even a smidgen of `space’ that we have in life continues - and that smidgen of `space’ can be proven in some manner - then the science of today’s technology may go a long way to calm the seeking mind regarding one of the biggest personal issues in reality.

Indeed, what seems to be happening, to those with an open mind about these various phenomena that the Heavy Stuff has been blogging about, is that `some communication’ between the `living’ and the `dead’ is able to occur — and it seems that the direct event-horizon between the two spheres - can be influenced by intentionality’s from `both sides’. Let me summarized what I am trying to express.

First, `the findings’ suggest a range of how much `intentionalities’ matter. From our living side - the `recorder’ can be as impartial as the junkyard video security camera picking up a `ghost’ coming to `look’ at the car one died in that same evening. (As readers know, I have blogged about such a video and the video can be seen at www.squidoo.com/theheavystuff) The video camera is simply recording the `space-time’ it actualizes/records — the wrecker yard ghost is not intentionally `performing’ for the camera to show `life in the great beyond’. It is simply an event-horizon `event’ that is accessible to a passive recording device. And, as readers of the Heavy Stuff know — the same can be said of `ghosts’ that show up in humanish form in photographs - an event that has happened many times over the last two centuries. However, this photographic event - seems to have `some’ intentionality from `the other side’ being-space. After all, they DO have to get into position for the photograph and `display an identifiable human space’ for recording. And, we also know that the same `unintentional’ pick up of human spaces with voice capability seems to happen on blank tapes at times called EVP. (It could be said again that EVP may involve intentionality from the other side.)

But, we also know that each of these seemingly `random’ contact events from the `other side’ seem to be able to be `forced’ to occur at a level far more than chance events would allow.  I’ve blogged here already about Harry Houdini’s coded message for his wife that he seemed to be able to `get thru’ during sittings with mediums that were conducted and  specifically called for that very reason - the very definition of an intentionality. And, firm intentionality’s on both sides were able to impart specific pre-agreed upon information from the other side to our side. There was belief on both sides that the effort-intentionality’s would succeed.

I’ve also blogged about the Leslie Flint recordings during which `voices’ of the dead `came thru’ — once again to a medium in a setting –`expecting contact and expecting information’. In this instance the Leslie Flint recordings were made for the the `space-intentionality’s of the other side’ to come thru to indicate and  voice `how’ the afterlife was `for them - for their specific space’. Much of the information that these `dead persons’ `said’ was how the afterlife is a state of mind and similar like minds- and that each state is a different `level’ - with further development of ones state of mind possible (even in the afterlife). IF true, it sounds a bit like what the eastern religions have been saying for centuries. (Would those in the afterlife LIE about conditions there? - Naw. LOL.)

That said, if you listen to the tapes - and I highly recommend it - the `dead’ beings indicated they were `still human’ - still looked human (but saw some folks they knew at ages they were surprised to see the person represented as being - meaning - one might know someone into their 60’s - they die - you see them in the afterlife as who they were when they were 20 - and you don’t recognize them at first). They also indicated that they still did `Earthly things’ - such as the bricklayer who still worked with bricks `just as real bricks as on your side’ and built things that people wanted - and this was done with other `dead’ bricklayers who the subject might have known or not known on earth. Somehow, our remaining `space’ after we die can `create’ or experience this full range of `doing’ the intentionality’s we often did on earth while living. Lighting up those fibers of existence so to speak.

And, I’ve also blogged about the extraordinary `events’ of the Ghosts of Flight 401. In these events — those from the other side, the pilots, were evidently able to `project’ that `dead virtual-space’ into the real reality we all agree upon does NOT include dead spaces. In essence, REAL GHOSTS, with full perceivable spaces - in the event-horizon ——– that, as described by witnesses - disappeared in a `pop of light’ - literally vanishing in front of alive folks eyes. Unfortunately, these events of the pilots of flight 401 were not recorded on film.

To The Heavy Stuff, it does not take a great leap of intellect to see the possible connection between the `spaces’ of the pilots that `re-appeared’ and the occasionally recorded instances of a doppelganger. Indeed, doppelganger’s seem to be the same entity but in reverse - a ghostly form of a living person. To think that the doppelganger is the same virtual-space-identity after we die - is not a big leap of intellect either. Could we all be exploring the real reality right now with our virtual space within the doppelganger we all have? Could we take the representation of our space `elsewhere’ such as the reports of `remote viewing’? Would our living doppelganger be the `lucid body’ we have during lucid dreaming? Where does this virtual space that the living have - come from? Is it already a part of our real space — that isn’t part of the real reality to begin with?

Remember how the Heavy Stuff has talked about `spaces’ within the Heavy Stuff’s ideas on phenomenology? The Heavy Stuff’s position is that `our personal space’ — the real one that has a duration and `runs off’ with our appearance of space to other spaces — is NOT part of the `run off’ of appearances. Our real space is NOW only to us -  the space of our appearance is PAST (to us - in our real space) just as all other spaces (people, pencils, bedpans, etc) are PAST to us (as it takes time for the light that bounces off their real space to reach our eyes/perception). The Heavy Stuff goes further and posits that `space-itselfs’ main attribute is that `it’ `space’ is NOT ABLE TO BE. It is that attribute, sequentially, that describes `what space IS’. All we living folk hope for - for us to continue into the `afterlife’ - is for our own NOT ABLE TO BE to continue at some level. From our own space is where we will find our perception ability and continued intentionality’s.

But, events such as a doppelganger or the `real ghosts’ of flight 401 are extraordinarily rare - to the point of being only anecdotal - but represent, perhaps just what may be ultimately possible for `spaces’ that still have an identity with a specific human form-space. Indeed, it is nearly certain that the virtual-space we have after death is quite small - virtually unseeable perhaps to the naked eye - perhaps nothing more than a `real’ virtual particle. Perhaps just part of the virtual spaces that are all around us and are a significant part of the real reality in which we living spaces reside.

 And, once again, as I have blogged before, these `virtual-spaces outside of reality’s consensus’ somehow actualize when recorded via devices such as cameras and recording tapes.

It’s important to remember that estimates by science are that 60-120 billion humans have lived and died on earth since mankinds rise - if we have a virtual space after death - some of those billions may still be hanging around humans even today. Indeed, while pure speculation - I have a new link of a video on the internet, again on my anomalies site, of an ORBlike light coming out of a babies mouth (seeable thru the camera’s eyepiece too). Could that be the way a soul enters a body? Could a body be-have a number of `souls’? Or, is that just the freedom that might exist for orbs - free to go anywhere.

Perhaps orbs are the few beings that die that have transcended the `material state of minds’ that is the virtual afterlife for most spaces. Perhaps orbs are conscious spaces that have intentionality’s or can be influenced by intentionality’s of living spaces. Influenced to perhaps show up in pictures, strangely. To communicate that the orb space is not a film miscue but a real entity with continued space. Joyously dancing in the development of the film - to communicate that `our space’ - the part of us that has always been - NOT ABLE TO BE - continues - at least at some level - and with some level of intelligence.

As most of you know, this website often features the links I have on my Anomalies lens. You can find the link to my site under my side blogroll `Anomalies, Paranormal, and Mind Perceptions - please visit to find this link and more -  http://www.leslieflint.com./transcripts_chinese.html. The above link is to an amazing amazing website that I can’t recommend more highly. It has the miraculous. It has numerous `direct voice communications’ from the dead recorded from the mid 1950’s to the 70’s. While I will let you use the link to the site to find all it has to offer (which is an amazing list of the highlights of the tape recordings) - I will briefly summarize my take on it. 

Basically,  in the 1950’s and 1960’s, and until the early 70’s, a group of researchers tried to take a direct approach to the dead — literally asking them to speak aloud in a occult type setting - begging any spirit to speak and identify themselves. They beckoned these spirits with the enticement that they were recording the `spirit’ with a purpose to explain what the afterlife is like. An incredible variety of folks `came thru’ and were recorded - and they tell what the `afterlife’ is like in astounding detail.

Additionally, as I mentioned, the website features the `heaviest’ words of wisdom of each of the spirits that came thru. It’s an amazing variety of esoteric thought. The link I have above was from a Chinese wise-man of ancient times — and indeed — you will find that what he has to say is profound and seems to come from another advanced consciousness level IMO (in my opinion).

An example of the characters who came thru - such as Bimbo the Clown — who enlightens us with esoteric ideas such as  `we can’t escape ourselves’ and `the animals here aren’t in cages’ (I listened to the entire Bimbo recording - a must listen.). Bimbo had many things to say about humor and circus folk too - all insightful. Really. I also fully listened to a bricklayer and even a dead spirit who answered if UFO’s were from other planets. Again, the best link to this site was posted on my Squidoo lens on June 12th (easy to find on my one page lens).

All these recordings will make you think and describe in amazing detail what continued existence may be like for a consciousness.  And, are these direct voice recordings any different, really, than the EVP recordings of the last couple decades or so? (Except better.) It’s a distinction without much merit to me. Each method beckons or records the `unknown human consciousness’ for a `sign of information transfer’ into the present.

Also, if you are a reader of The Heavy Stuff — you know I’ve tackled the `Ghost’ `issue (afterlife and afterlife communication issue) before — whether the Ghosts of Flight 401(who also spoke out-loud after `appearing’ in a `real present’) or the 4 Ghost videos I have linked to in a previous post that can still be found at my lens squidoo.com/theheavystuff. I’ve also blogged about how Houdini seems to have been able to get a message thru from the great beyond into the `real reality we all experience’. Houdini’s message was even in `code’ to make sure the message couldn’t be faked. Like the direct voice recordings, it also was `delivered’ in an occult type setting to `believers’ in communication with the dead - who were probing for SPECIFIC INFORMATION/knowledge.

I trust that I’ve made a case that these are all similar phenomena in a broad sense. But as you know, this blog’s interest is in examining the phenomenology of these anomalies. Just `where’ does this information, voices or even ghosts with voices `come from’? And, once again, what does it indicate about `our space’ in the afterlife if this information is to be believed?

I guess the first thing it indicates about dead humans is that - we still have a space - our space - the one space with OUR one now. The one space that was NEVER part of the `reality structure’ to begin with - even in life. (See my last blog post about freewill vs determinism in humans). The one space and only space that was NOW to us. The one space that contained our intentionality’s - and also - our freewill.

In essence, with death we leave our `time in consensus projected space’ behind — in our body. The time-space we always `projected’ onto `our reality’ of other close objects. Other close `spaces’ - like everything in your field of vision that IS something. And, with death, we would move into - in essence — our remaining personal space - probably called the spirit by many. A personal space with one HUGE connection with real reality — THE NOW - THE NOT ABLE TO NOT BE. The `determined time’ of spaces.

For those readers who are still pushing for some speculation as to `where’ these NOW’s really are — I will explore some possibilities in part 2. Do you think the answer might be similar to `where is cyber-space’? Stay TUNED. And, thanks for reading - leave a comment.

Lately, I’ve offered two posts about the relationship between `dead spaces’ (dead human spirits) and the real `reality’ of `time-space’? Specifically, I offered my speculation that the `light’ seen by so many at the time of NDE is our SUN - yes, the star 93 million miles away. I speculated that `life after death’ may be short-lived — for most beings/souls — and that nearly all human consciousnesses end up in the sun. But, that stated, `life’ would indeed extend beyond the body and beyond the normal scope of what we consider the time-space of ‘real’ (at least our ability to interact with it). Additionally, I expressed the view that some `dead spaces’ or `ghosts’ don’t go to the sun but do remain `alive’ on Earth for a limited time-frame. Their `dead space’ going on — which equals - life after death; for at least a few and especially right after death.

My next post related to The Ghosts of Flight 401 — see below for that post in its entirety, but, in a nutshell — it appears that `some’ `dead spaces’ can project their appearance into the `real’ reality structure. Evidently. Again, in summary, the dead pilots from the crashed jet were spotted on jets which had their re-cycled parts used from the salvage of the crashed jet. These `dead’ pilots claimed outloud to have an `intention’ to keep the L-1011’s safe from then onward. The events with the pilots happened multiple times -and multiple times - their `appearance space’ vanished in an `instant of time’ (an instant of space perhaps) before multiple witnesses - both witnesses that knew them while alive and those that never knew them.

These `appearances’ would suggest that `intentionality’ can even project into space-time, perhaps for years or even for an indefinite time-frame (until a task is completed)——– and, that one (ghosts) still had intentionality `while dead’ — at least if one (while dead) is hanging around the space of the Earth. And, doesn’t get swept up in the marvels of the universe from a `free space’ condition.

But, that brings us to Houdini - and the legend of his `escape’ from death - back to the `living’. I have the link on my squidoo site directly — and it’s under the Great Anomaly Stories Section (easy to find) - at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman  or you can copy and paste the link directly — but — come right back.   Here’s that other site — same story — survivalafterdeath.org/articles/ford/houdini.htm remember to put in the www - (I prefer you become familiar with my site anomalyman)

Now that you are familiar with the story-legend — let me provide the important summary points as I see them. #1 — `Time’ existed (exists) on `the other side’; twice the period it takes to get the `message thru’ is noted, each time several months. Additionally, the `dead spaces’ (Houdini and his mother) seem to indicate that a few months seems like a long time-frame of effort - then again, that could be my just my read of the words.

Nevertheless, the `dead spaces’ (Ghosts) had `time’ within which they existed (interestingly, nothing else about their other existence is noted except for the intent of getting this message thru as `proof of survival’. (Could we survive as nothing but intentionality’s?)

Now, many folks would go the extra mile to make up proof of survival — but for Houdini - he was the opposite, a total debunker of the afterlife. If this story is to be accepted as `truth-proof’ at least it isn’t from a lifelong proponent of `heaven’. (I will note that no images of heaven seem to be in Houdini’s explanations of the other side either — just a determination and intentionality of spirit.) Once again, this feeling of sameness exists with  the Ghosts of Flight 401 intentionality’s surviving for a mission and Houdini’s intentionality’s surviving for a mission. Are future intentionality’s the  link?

Seemingly, the phenomenology of space-time `bends’ to provide projection of information (intentions) or, rarely, even `appearances’ from `beyond’ within the `real’ consensus of the moment-to-moment reality. Whether caught on tape (see my squidoo.com March 16th ghost videos) or by the real human naked eye.

It’s also easy to draw this comparison to even `second comings’ — be them a few days after death — or much later based on actualizing some long promised intentionality (especially helps if one believes? or society believes?) I’ll leave the rest of that speculation for some other time.

There is only one other possible speculation, for me, that provides a real chance that Houdini wasn’t involved (nor his mother) in `getting his double coded message thru’ — and that would be that Arthur Ford — (as Fletcher) was indeed a mind-reader and got the info from Mrs Houdini’s mind. And, while I’m not saying that is the answer — I’d have to give it at least a real 20% chance if I were to bet on the outcome of that - or 80% - to the chance that Houdini proved to be the `Ultimate Escape Artist Ever - Even Escaping Death’.

Thanks for reading. What do you think - leave a comment.