The Heavy Stuff

Hello, welcome back to The Heavy Stuff (THS) - thanks for hitting the link or favorited bookmark (and, also, to my 40 or so subscribers too). Today’s post is a little off the beaten path compared to the `normal’ (lol) posting on this blog (normal around here are speculations about consciousness, the afterlife, ufo’s and such - and, indeed I’m working on at least two posts right now) - as this post  covers what I am now calling `Heavy News’ on my Squidoo `AnomalyMan Listing’ webpage. And, a quick read of the title of this post gives you an idea about `my spin’ on some recent events/things.

Actually, if you are a fan of THS - you remember that last fall - during the peak of the teetering of the financial system - THS on three occasions took to calling a spade a spade. Never before did this blog get so many `general population’ type readers via Goggle users looking up the term `economic collapse’ - literally, thousands. And, while this post will skirt about the edges of the Economic Collapse issue - recent events have brought to focus just how manipulative the media has been in any number of ways (nothing new of course).

But, before I talk politics and the media’s political spin - since this is generally a non-political blog -  I want to share that I have NEVER ONCE voted for a democrat or republican for President since 1976 - voting each time for the Libertarian candidate as the least objectionable choice (confession - living near Atlanta I met, shook hands and talked for a minute privately with Bob Barr - months before he ran for President) - yes, correct, I really don’t like the Libertarians all that much anymore - especially with the Presidential contest they just ran. So, perhaps that amounts to a view of pure skepticism in many folks eyes. So be it.  Then, throw into that, the media’s simpleton approach to any issue - and you have my general view in a nutshell.

So; let me provide examples of `Howard Beale-ism’ that are seemingly screaming out to a totally deaf - but also confused at times - big time TV media.For those who don’t know who Howard Beale is/was ………… you are probably under 45, and, probably think you are a democrat (I normally call democrats - democraps. Don’t smirk republicans; I call them republinuts. How can anyone have respect for political partys represented by a Jackass and Bloated Elephant?) Indeed, please look his `name’ up on Wikipedia - but, knowing you, a democrap, you probably won’t - so - in abbreviated USA Today style, —-  Howard, a fictional newsreader, represented the `Fed-Up Citizen’ in a 1970’s movie - where in his most famous scene,  he opens a window and shouts out to the public “I’m Mad As Hell, And, I’m Not Going To Take It Anymore”. (And, then, others began the scream too.)

And, indeed, the mid 70’s were an infuriating period in America; - having most folks thinking, for the first time really, that `the government lies about things to promote an agenda’ (regardless of `party’). Additionally, our society had just scooted out of a war and had a press taking on a lying President (after his VP took bribes and resigned) followed by an Unelected President (Ford). So, the funny thing, is that `Howard’ was screaming in an era where the Press actually stood up and perhaps stood for something. Now, the press doesn’t even recognize Howard.

But, this is the 2000’s. Now, we have a greatly weakened Newspaper industry in shambles in what is becoming the worst downturn and financial crisis since the 1930’s. Indeed, in the old days of yesteryear, we `the citizens’ could at least hope that the muckrakers of the day would have dug up the coming AIG fiasco - or talked more of `real estate anomalies’ (or credit default swaps) - instead of pumping the bubble by having a blind eye to an impossible to sustain market condition. Or, perhaps challenge our lawmakers to at least put the Iraq war `on the budget’ instead of off-budget. Don’t you think?

Or, did they - do they -  think `they’ are no longer entitled to the truth by the government - and certainly the citizens aren’t entitled to it.

But, NO. We had and have the weakest, lamest, wimpiest version of muckrakers ever seen in the profession. (This includes the big Internet sites too.) What we have are TV news (give that story 15 seconds) and Newspaper weaklings  that bow to political correctness and have zero backbone or ideals. And, one that seems INCAPABLE of understanding,  or depicting, dissent in this country. And, obviously, our recent nationwide protests bring that to mind. (Protests you say?)

This bubbling up of the Howard Beale (HB) sentiment began brewing last year with the run for President by Ron Paul - and - also the run for President by Mike Huckabee who `stood alone’ for the Fair Tax. Both candidates and their `unique ideas’ were scoffed at and treated as if they had coodies. This despite the relative successes of both campaigns overall. But, by the time the candidate field was whittled down to one on each side - those folks/citizens who were identified with Paul or the Fair Tax - (the Howard Beale’s) - were largely marginalized.

Then, last fall, the crappola that Ron Paul had been talking about - the very weakness of the financial system - which the media ignored when he said the words ———— was suddenly coming true. The Federal Reserve and the Treasury -`they said’ - suddenly needed to `save’ the very system our politicians had built. If not, dear citizen,  Great Depression Two was promised as a possibility. I guess we all were expected to just be quiet and let the powerful `save us’. How very nice of them!

Instead, after trillions was given to the very big businesses that had caused the bubble and crash, we have instead ———- The Great Recession of the 2000’s. Indeed, I want you to look at this interactive link from Slate.Com — I’VE NEVER SEEN A LINK SAY IT ALL LIKE THIS ABOUT THE ECONOMY. http://slate.com/id/2216238/   This link visually depicts the FACTS about NOW — not rhetoric about `hope for the future’. (That said, if the dollar doesn’t implode - the trillions should buy some measure of slowing the decline.) Please see this link - then - send it to as many folks as you can - I’ve never asked my readers to do so before - this link is that important for understanding `where’ the country lies in this `recovery’.

Indeed, what  `hope’ can be found in `slowing the decline/crash’. Is this just delaying a Depression like scenario? Is not the visual shown by this map on the above link the most frightening you have ever seen?

Indeed, the media, concerning the economic situation is torn between promoting — things will never be the same (February’s positioning) — and - things can be the same again (March’s positioning). (While pushing the Tent city stories off the screen - or - the recent story on condo’s in Miami (video on CNBC) that once were $700,000 going for $130,000.) And, while wealth destruction is rampant and all around everyone - the media `rounds up the wagon train’ around `action’ from our `democrap’ lawmakers - quote - holding them accountable for `doing something’. (Isn’t this like closing the barn door………?)

So, what is `The Cost’ for allowing lawmakers who ruined a system to fix it? Trillions and trillions. And trillions. (Along with getting the government itself into the banking system and thereby - everyone’s life.) And, unbelievably, it might still - NOT even be `fixed’. —- But, we, the citizens are expected to be quiet (oh, by the way, eventually Ron Paul’s supporters ended up on Government lists of folks to `watch’).

As the Russians and Chinese - suggest a new - world currency. And, still, the people/sheeple are expected to be quiet.

And, with that as a backdrop — someone woke Howard Beale up again.

This time, his name was Rick Santelli - who used the idea of another `Tea Party’ being necessary to wake up the government and the politicians. Unless you were asleep for a of couple days, parts of his `rant’ - of his anger - were allowed to make the TV screen. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEZB4taSEoA And, regardless of his words, it was his emotion - the real anger - authentic anger at the system - that was the news.But, somehow, our blind, weak media missed the significance of it. After all, the sheeple need to be quiet and stop their bah-bah(ing).

NO, our media has been involved in promoting the chance that our new President may actually figure a way out of the mess without pain to anyone. Now, I’ll grant you in a second that President Obama is impressive in his speech and thought process. And, if anyone can figure out a way out - it is probably him. That said, there may be no way out - or - the way out - would be better in some direction other than that promoted by the democraps.

But, that wouldn’t be PC.

But, there is no other way - not in a country with just `two’ views on things - democrap and republinut. Think about it this way - if 1/3 or so of citizens identify themselves as independents (read, hate each party) and if say 3% are really Libertarians - when was the last time you heard a Libertarian on TV or a viewpoint not suggested by a demo or repo – is it one out of every 33 times a politician is on TV? Of course not - to the big media & mainstream newspapers and such — one almost never hears the `ideas’ of the fringe. Or, those that disagree with the system. (To them, the talking head media, fringe ideas get absorbed by the two parties over time.)

So, when suddenly, on April 13th - when the media realized that common citizens would soon be seeing `TEA Protests’ often in their hometown or in front of the IRS - (or White House - or State Capital) - they had to `scramble’ to catch up on the story. (To someone, like me, reporting real news via the internet, I had the link to this April 6th on my Squidoo page.) You would have thought this was all happening spontaneously. (The media talking heads were like — what’s this Tea Tax party all about - we just gave the sheeple a tax cut last week?)

Suddenly, they, the big media,  had to put a `face’ onto these TEA Protesters. Conveniently, to the mainstream sheeple PC press, this meant - they - those protesters -  must be `fringe’ conservatives. Or, at least they told us that. They `wondered’ how many would really show-up? Or, at least they told us that. Even the power-brokers on `the right’ missed that this was Howard Beale in the streets — not `people from the right’.

So, thruout the country, in towns large and small - with crowds that were both LARGE and small - citizens gathered last week to say - “I’m mad as hell and I’m NOT ……” — But, the media didn’t hear that.

NO, the big media has an interest to minimize the sheeple anger - to marginalize it. No credibility is given to the fact that the Tea Party was nationwide, in towns of all sizes, by folks of all ages,  - or - that it was also a protest against current policies in general.

A Howard Beale feeling that is tired of being ignored by the PC press and media. Indeed, could it have been the ignoring of the HB (Howard Beale) movement - that lead to the `floating’ of the idea of state secession again? Is there any feeling strong enough to get the mainstream media’s attention? Is secession it? — And, yesterday - Ron Paul said this about `state’ secession - http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/20/ron-paul-thoughts-on-secession/ - it’s a four minute video.

Some folks may remember that last fall a report - years old - by a USSR man - suggested that the USA may break apart into six areas or country’s. If you look at the first Slate link - and see that Texas is in a different situation than most of America - one can see how certain states may want a new union. States that were less involved in the Federal Fraud. Would the media even be willing to entertain such ideas? Not this media.

After all, this is a media that YESTERDAY again - ignored nationwide protests —- of the nations marijuana laws. Protests that have been going on at an organized level for decades. By, folks tired of being told that Micheal Phelps is a loser for toking when thousands die of alcohol overdoses yearly. Think I’m kidding? Check this out - http://www.coloradodaily.com/news/2009/apr/20/420-cu-colorado-boulder-marijuana-pot-smoke-out/ - and, I assure you that supporters of hemp and medical marijuana were NOT happy with the way President Obama brushed off the pot question at his recent internet town hall meeting. But, then again, when you have a media that ISN’T OUTRAGED that tens of thousands are in jail for pot while in other states Judges order the police to return 12 pounds of pot to another citizen based on doctors orders (don’t believe me - see this - http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Dude-Wheres-My-Pot.html). And, not one state has that has had reform - was led by the politicians - most were led by citizen initiatives. Worthless politicians and media, again. Millions upon millions waiting decades for the politicians to do the right thing - or - for the media to point it out.

Finally, we have President Obama yesterday asking his cabinet members to save 100 MILLION budget dollars - while the government ran up a deficit of over 120 BILLION in one month alone. And, yet, the media can’t hear Howard Beale yelling - screaming - begging - for them to do their job. But, who has time for that when Miss USA gave a `controversial answer’ to the gay marriage question (they forgot that it is the same as Obama’s) and no one is interested why 70% of Somalians support the pirates. Could there be two sides? OMG. http://www.infowars.com/you-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates/ Or, cover the fact of an astronaut again saying the government is covering up about the alien presence on Earth - spinning it - without ever covering the `deceivers’ - satisfied with another `brush off statement’ by NASA. (You mean the media lets the government lie about pot, aliens, immigrants, big money and more — quiet sheeple.)

Indeed, the big media hopes they can `entertain’ you with `murder mysteries’ (like the craiglist case) and such nonsense; hoping to lull the sheeple — hoping that Howard Beale goes back into the film canister and doesn’t rear his ugly head - or voice - again.

And, that’s today’s news - Howard Beale reporting.

A link for the Tea Party numbers (the number of Beale’s) http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjcwN2Y0M2MzMjc4MzViMTNjOWQzZTZjNDU5NjE4ZTY=

You can also find all the above links and much more on my squidoo page at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman and, if you want more of my few rants about politics use this http://theheavystuff.com/?cat=14

Thanks for visiting and reading and thinking - I’d appreciate your views too - leave a comment today.

In the last couple of days I’ve been surfing the net, as usual, to find material for my daily AnomalyMan listing on Squidoo. One place I always check out is www.anomalist.com as it’s overall point of view closely matches mine when describing `anomalous’ links of dubious natures. And, it’s two of those links that I have today on my Squidoo webpage (March 27th date) that set off my brain concerning the phenomenology of the ontological structure.

One of the links (all links will be at the bottom of this post) had to do with a MUFON investigator and his recording of a very anomalous `light in the sky at night’ experience that he interprets as Ufo Orbs and their Mothership - and indeed, the link will have pictures that will convince you too that the image explanation could be justified. What’s shown is one brighter light with an apparent connection to another series of `lights’ (different light filters show a golden shaped `interior’ craft).

The other link goes to the story of a serious  gentleman who actively is seeking some answers to the Bigfoot In America saga. And again, this time too, a seeker of the unknown was rewarded with the very thing desired - this time in the form of a 7 foot terrifying `monster’ with a voice which had a bellow beyond belief - and told in a manner that leaves little doubt as to its temporal occurrence to the observer.

So, when I read each of these stories, nearly in order, it set off my brain. Immediately, thoughts like - could `everything’ that is a space — like a human, comb, grass, robin, world, star, atom, — everything — which has a space and has a mass - and that exists IN an ontological structure — everything LIKE that — has one unifing characteristic - it is knowable. VERY KNOWABLE. (Can be measured.)

Then, my mind continued to turn over. Could `everything’ that is UNKNOWN have a space too? A `space’ which can be `called’ to be what it needs to be? To be what it HAS TO BE? (Whatisnotabletontobeis) And, could such `spaces’ only happen (or nearly only happen) when expectations and intentionality’s are raised and/or focused? When the `expectations’ of the `observer’ could trigger the intentionality’s of the `unknown space’?

Hence, MUFON investigators will see Ufo’s. Hence, Bigfoot investigators will see Bigfoots. Hence, Ghost investigators will find Ghosts. And EVP investigators — well, I think you get the idea by now. It seems that the will of the intentionality’s is all that is needed for a Fortean event of an Unknown nature to occur. (Could it be that the `intentionality’s’ come from the unknown when a `possession’ occurs of a human? Does the Unknown have some specific `spooky’ nature to it? A nature different than the Known - which might be `positive’ in some overall balance?)

And, if spirits can be beckoned in this manner (from the unknown) and Ufo’s too can be `beckoned’ — might the `nature’ of these two experiences really be able to be grouped together? Does this justify all the `nutcases’ that claim its the devil who is the ufo’s? (And, of course, this does not rule out nut and bolt ufo’s from existing along with all of us human beings - on our side of reality - in the known - because they have space.) Could this be why Prophet Yahweh could call a `light’ into the sky?

And, really, aren’t scientific discoveries actually similar? A seeker of the unknown - `finds’ the information - that one was seeking as a scientist. Would the `Ufo’s’ and `Bigfoot’s’ BE - information? Information in the rawest form?

A Information or intelligence `representation’  which has expectations and intentionalities? And, could the transfer of those expectations bring a `space’ together with that information base - which might even be able to occur,  and `act’ for a `real temporal’ event. Being infused with `knowledge’ for a moment(s). Being the very display of the unknown.

Hey, thanks for reading - I appreciate your interest - bookmark THS and come back soon for more heavy thoughts. You have seen my FRONT page, right?

Enjoy the two links, and many more, at www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan  - just check March 27th - or see the Ufo-Mufon story at http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0309/ufo-orb.php and the Bigfoot story at http://blogsquatcher.blogspot.com/2009/03/angry-old-man.html.

To the thinking individual, several `paranormal’ phenomena are beginning to seem to have the same `origin’ or `ontology’ - (ontology is defined as a branch of metaphysics concerned with the nature and relations of being — or — a particular theory about the nature of being or the kinds of existent). Specifically, I am referring to the `spaces’ or descriptions of Tulpas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtform (best described by the previous wiki link), Orbs, and Zooforms — to which, this link is the best description http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/neil-arnold-the-interview/ . Sorry for taking you thru so much background links for this posting — but, this subject matter is not mainstream media like Bigfoot or Ufo’s — and my assumption is that many need to brush up on their understanding as to how these phenomena are described.

As regular readers know, The Heavy Stuff loves to position phenomenology as critical to understanding `strange phenomena’. Just as Einstein’s love of thought produced the simple equation E=MC(squared) — phenomenology also reduces `appearances’ and `phenomena’ to the most basic look at reality. To The Heavy Stuff, that means taking our reality right `down’ to its basic components of space and time (or what we call time). The Heavy Stuff has been positioning that those `words’ (space/time) — our most basic constitution of being — can be `described’ using some ontological terms.

The Heavy Stuff’s most complete description of the word `space’ can be found at the blog - http://whatisnotabletonotbe.blogspot.com — simply put — just as John Paul Sartre had words for space - time - and being — so does The Heavy Stuff. Whereas Sartre used concepts such as Being In Itself, Being For Itself and Being For Others — The Heavy Stuff has basic words to describe the biggest concepts for consciousness - namely, space - time - and - existence.

Specifically, The Heavy Stuff’s `concept’ for the very idea of `space’ - is that `Space’ IS —> NOT ABLE TO BE . The Heavy Stuff’s `concept’ for `time’ IS —-> ABLE TO NOT BE. And, The Heavy Stuff’s `concept’ for our reality/existence IS ——–> NOT ABLE TO NOT BE … The words (not able to not be) literally meaning  `something that is determined’ — and, obviously, our reality, the one that we experience in common with others,  is determined. That is because, all spaces, but our own, `come’ to us via light waves with their `runoff’ of space. What we see as NOW is NOT NOW as it `arrives’ via a manner which `tells’ us — it has already occurred - and comes to us as pre-determined light waves of information. Having a `space’ ourselves - gives us a particular `positioning/placement’ compared to every other thing in existence with a `space’ (or mass of an object).

I know your head might be spinning if you have never encountered phenomenology before — or if you did — you just wrote it off as a lot of mumbo-jumbo. As I mentioned before, phenomenology attempts to look at the very biggest `issues’ of being. The biggest issues to being human or  to having a consciousness.

And, the equivalent to `who made God’ - for phenomenology - is, `how could time have ever begun?’ — These phenomenological concepts that I will now try to describe - go right to the very very beginning so to speak.  Indeed, The Heavy Stuff begs your indulgence for the next several paragraphs  about the beginning of the phenomenology positioning of The Heavy Stuff.

At the very `beginning’ of experience there had to be the `potential’ for `reality’ or space/time to occur. But, it was just the potential for a reality - not the expression of that reality. There would have been a `oneness’ - a `sameness’ to all - everything. OR one could say, there was an ABLE TO BE in the beginning of the eternity `before’ the reality of space/time. But, eventually, (science would have us believe it was 13.7 billion years ago) the `oneness’ of ABLE TO BE was `forced’ to `accept’ one and perhaps two simultaneous `equal concepts’. BUT, since the ABLE TO BE was/is everything — the evolution of `beingness’ — the very ABLE TO BE itself — was not violated by having a `new’ description of `everything’.

And, that `new description’ literally — was the `explosion’ of the concept of `space-time’. The ABLE TO BE evolved INTO a `thing’ that turned out to be `space’ itself - and all the physical properties that describe the mass of space and elements.  Indeed, as opposed to GOD being ABLE TO BE (everything) — the first space — was able to NOT BE GOD  (to not-be `potential’, by actualizing space) — `it’ was to be able to have the ability to be NOT ABLE TO BE — it wasn’t GOD, it wasn’t `permanent’ -  it was `something else’ a `space’. A space which was NOT ABLE TO BE. It’s very definition and `appearance’  being its representation of `the space’s’ unique identity - it’s unique singularness.

Immediately, with the `invention’ of the `new’ concept — `that original space’ - would realize its `original relation to the original space that GOD or the ABLE TO BE possessed that was `different’ in concept. THAT event would be between `two spaces’ GOD, the able to be, and Space, the NOT able to be. Suddenly, reality had volume and texture - it had a BEFORE (in the able to be) and a `NOW’ in the `space’ of the NOT ABLE TO BE.

We are, indeed, speaking metamorphically about the beginning of consciousness of course. Be it God becoming aware of its parts — or Space becoming aware that it isn’t God. As this concept `expanded’ `space’ would be aware of even more than `the before of God’ — it, space, would be aware that `other spaces than it’ COULD BE. Those `other spaces’ other than God and Space. Space becoming more than one thing (first element changing into more elements?) — a `NEW’ concept beyond the NOT ABLE TO BE.

And, indeed, that concept is ABLE TO NOT BE ———– able to not be the NOT ABLE TO BE. A `new’ space - or beingness idea. Another way for God to `express and appear’ within the ABLE TO BE furnished as the basis for everything. It could be said that the ABLE TO NOT BE is TIME (in a sense) — or — the repeating of the being of space. The whole concept of time (able to not be) GIVES `space’ `somewhere’ to BE (now). OR, the ABLE TO NOT BE is the realization that space has being - expressed as duration.

The Heavy Stuff needs one more paragraph of indulgence from the reader to explain the final combining `concept’ of the Heavy Stuff’s phenomenology. Simply put — we aren’t quite at a real reality yet via the above descriptions of space and time and god. We need the phenomenology descriptions of reality itself. AND, the combining of NOT ABLE TO BE with the ABLE TO NOT BE —— became what is considered the REAL REALITY — THE NOT ABLE TO NOT BE — the determined. The reality we all see before us right now. Basic words to describe the segments which make up the determined reality all consciousness’s experience.

It takes all of those phenomenology words to begin to describe what today’s topic might be about - the topic being the similarity of Tulpas, Zooforms and Orbs.

Wikipedia describes Zooforms (thoughtforms) with words such as these:

These are not animals at all, but entities or apparitions which adopt or seem to have (quasi)animal form. This is where we (at least to some extent) enter science fictionterritory. In many ways, these elusive and contentious entities have plagued cryptozoology since its inception, and tend to be dismissed by mainstream science as thoroughly unworthy of consideration. Zooform phenomena seem to be a strange blend of paranormal manifestation and mythology…However, Jonathan Downeswho first coined the term in 1990, maintains that many zooform phenomena result from complex psychosocial and sociological phenomena, and suggests that to classify all such phenomena as “paranormal” in origin is counterproductive…Thoughtform may be understood as a ‘psychospiritual’ complexof energy or consciousness manifested either consciously or unconsciously, by an individual or a group. Thoughtform are understood differently and take on different forms in different traditions. Stated differently, a thoughtform, is a subtle objectification that may or may not have consciousness and self-determination. Thoughtform may be benevolent, malevolent or of complex alignment and may be understood as a spontaneous or intentional manifestation from a combination of willpower, bioenergy, discipline, chi, prana and/or astral or ætherial substance

Simply put, the Zooform is a `space’ with conscious identity - which does not `appear’ `normally’. Except for the fact that Ghosts have a real person identity - as opposed to a mythical beast (which has an identity that has been imagined) — the similarities are obvious — consciousness’s that are looking for a space to appear in within what we call reality.

Now, consider how similar the words Wikipedia uses for Tulpas:

A tulpa is, in Tibetan mysticism, a being or object which is created through willpower, visualisation, attention and focus, concerted intentionality and ritual. In other words, it is a materialized thought that has taken physical form….

There are… apparitions that make public appearances. Some of these are said to be the perceptible double—the etheric counterpart—of a living person who is undergoing an out-of-body experience. Even more mysterious are the externalized perceptible manifestations of something whose existence originated in the mind of its creator by virtue of that person’s incredible powers of concentration, visualization, and other, more occult, efforts of the mind. In Tibet, where such things are practiced, a ghost of this kind is called a tulpa. A tulpa is usually produced by a skilled magician or yogi, although in some cases it is said to arise from the collective imagination of superstitious villagers, say, or of travelers passing through some sinister tract of country.— Mysteries of the Unexplained, 1990, Reader’s Digest Association Inc. page 176

Note - Zooforms described as `entities..adopting a ..form’ and Tulpas being `a being developed thru attention and focus’. Much more simply — spaces; with definition; that can become real.Indeed, you can see above that the description of Tulpa’s goes to the point of the delivery of `etheric doubles’ of humans having out-of-the-body experiences. Is this really different than doppelgangers or the pilots of the flight of Eastern 401 appearing after `death’? Isn’t a `space’ with consciousness `something’ whether it is `seen’ or even `real’? Don’t our very thoughts fit this description?

Finally, there’s Orb’s (which I have written about before on The Heavy Stuff — BTW - you can catch all of the topic in one easy place with my website www.squidoo.com/theheavystuff ) — again - here’s Wikipedia’s words: The opposing school maintains that orbs are paranormal in nature, i.e. non-naturalistic and ghost like…That orb photos can be gained anywhere has, however, been adopted into the position of conspiracy theorists who maintain that orbs are probes/devices being used by an alien culture to monitor human activities…

The Heavy Stuff knows that readers seek some bottom line - some bottom truth. The truth of these phenomena is that they are part of the `space’ spectrum. The end of the `space spectrum’ these entities exist within does not normally interact with `normal’ space - normal space with real mass. But, DOES seem to interact with the `conscious’ part of humans - the `part’ of humans that is able-to-not-be at a given moment. The `extra’ part of us all - our attention and awareness to space forms that are not our own space. While usually, this is ONLY our own thoughts (and the spaces involved with those thoughts) - our thoughts are not bound to us. Evidently, that space of us is connected to `something more’ than this reality of determined spaces. It is connected to sequences of spaces that could be interpreted as paranormal. And, evidently, when that happens — with intentionality’s from either side of space (the beyond of non-spaces and the here of real spaces) — the events can actually appear and be seen. Such as the rare Ghost appearance, such as the rare Tulpa appearance, such as the very rare appearance with `full space’ such as the pilots of Flight 401.

But, for the same reason that they appear (the ability to project the not-able-to-be space that they are) as an able-to-not-be in our reality - is the reason they `can’t continue’ and simply `pop’ out of existance  when they exhaust their own `energy’ of `showing as a space’ - as a not-able-to-be. More simply put, the able-to-not-be of our thoughts, our time, (in a sense) - `peter out’ - as they fade of `space’ - the very thoughts themselves. We create `spaces’ not-able-to-be’s — as we think. `Spaces’ that often influence how our real space moves - that seem to have a position.

But, they fade - just like human will. So too do Zooforms, Tulpas and Orbs fade - the moment they no longer have a space to influence the not able to not be. The consensus of determination does not allow for the continued existence of entities based on something other than the not-able-to-be. To exist INTO the future one (any space) must have a now AND a past — tulpas, orbs and zooforms - project INTO the present but instead of `running off’ into the future - those entities `run off’ into the past (really, they run off into the other - the able-to-not-be) not connected to the real future.

More Heavy thoughts soon - thanks for reading. Would love for you to visit my anomaly site at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman