The Heavy Stuff

Hello and welcome to The Heavy Stuff (THS). On this blog I try to explore fringe ideas (what my ideas seem to be) and make projections about possible meanings. And, to that end, some particular thoughts have entered my mind regarding some `anomalies’ that have been reported on the internet surrounding the huge earthquake in Chile; - reports of orbs, ufo’s and even glowing entities. Here’s an example of the last - http://inexplicata.blogspot.com/2010/03/chile-luminous-entity-spreads-panic.html.

Anyway, as I said, this incident was not the only anomalous thing reported near the time of the ground shaking events. But, it brings to my mind some `simple’ explanations for the actualization’s perhaps. As certainly, in the general area - literally that geographic region - more prayers (mind energy) were probably being intentionally directed locally and NON-locally to this location (spaces)  - than at any time in the recent past.

Now, any student of the paraNormal knows that `specialized thought’ - `specialized expectations’ - seems to be the `formula’ for experiencing/actualizing - non ordinary events. The `Bigfoot’ hunter goes into the forest and `hears’ the communicative wood taps. The `Ghost’ hunter - finds the electromagnetic influences they expect to find in a localized space. ——– All the way to the `space brother channeler’ who expects to be told ideas in their minds/heads that a space brother would say. And, in those localized `spaces’ events occur/actualize.

So, my `simple’ contention is that the actualization of Chilean anomalous events may have been due to a significant `excess’ in `energized for miracles’ space/spaces. Especially when enhanced with the probable strange electromagnetic Earth influences in the midst of the aftershocks. Perhaps, when that much Noosphere energy is about - the structures of perception can be changed too - (an idea I’ve already started a post for THS  this week - stay tuned).

I give a daily twist to High Strangeness on Squidoo where I am known as the AnomalyMan - Check out my daily page too - www.squidoo.com/anomalyman . Thanks.

Global Consciousness?
 More `Heavy’ Books - here - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=128 - Thanks for checking them out too.

Image source - http://paintek.com/doodles/light.jpg 

Hello, and welcome to The Heavy Stuff  (THS) - thanks for being inquisitive. Yes, as you can see from the title of this post - THS is about 100 esoteric posts old and just over 3 years on the calendar. And, as you may well know, THS has grown into a huge catalog of ideas that stretch from Time Travel to Doppelgangers to UFO’s to Consciousness Issues to Phenomenology and even more.

And, according to the stats of my host 1 and 1 - THS grew to 259,930 unique visitors in 2009, up from 195,854 in 08 and 72,223 in 07 (and 388 in 06) - and to over 419,000 page views in 09. Thanks so much for your reading support of esoteric ideas. Please continue to tell your friends that you have found a new blog with a whole lot of cool ideas to explore.

Now, with that all aside - let me first say - what you are probably saying - “this guy thinks he has ORIGINAL ideas? Give me a break.” — Ok, there, I said it. Now, let me try to fill a list up with just that, and, you be the judge. (I’m aware of Lennon or McCartney saying something to the effect that no ideas are original but just selected from what is available.)

Original Ideas

One of my more recent `original’ ideas was to blog about `Billion Year Old Entities’ — something that Greg Bishop at UFO Mystic said he had NEVER heard another speculate about before. I blogged about the possibility of such entities due to being tired of reading folks on various websites or forums make statements like `those aliens might be a hundred or a thousand years ahead of us’. Rarely do those folks even talk about beings being a million years more advanced. And that is what triggered my mind into thoughts about what BILLION year old entities might be like - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=118.

Another blog post that I’ve never read anywhere else is `IF The Government Discovered and Proved `Life After Death’ - would it be `disclosed’ to the public. (Well, have you ever read this elsewhere?) In this post I talk and speculate the reasons why such infomation - even if proved - might be withheld. http://theheavystuff.com/?p=104

Perhaps a little less original - but original in the sense of being talked about in ONE post - was my article titled `Aliens/Entities Objectified - Are There Four Types? - where I expanded the whole subject of entities to include what I see as ONLY four types - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=100.

Next - You know when something REALLY special happens - something rare that STICKS out and is instantly known and famous - like the Hudson River Jet Landing? — As far as I know - I was the only person to blog - How Could Hudson River Plane Crash Elation Not Have Been Picked Up By Even One Psychic? —– WELL? http://theheavystuff.com/?p=101

And, as far as I know and have EVER read - am I the only one to blog - Can The Collective Dead Of Humanity - Evolve? — And, this is NOT a small idea - it has lots of ramifications. A great read. http://theheavystuff.com/?p=91

And, how about a `collective dream appearing in space’ — like when I blogged Could An Oct.14th Alien Craft Display Be A Collective Lucid Dream Apprearing In Space? — anyone else? http://theheavystuff.com/?p=71

Or, have you EVER read anyone else blogging about Husserl? As in The Transformation of Ideas Through Temporal Characters - WELL? http://theheavystuff.com/?p=74

Or, have you EVER read someone imply that Might Alien Disclosure Mean Virtually Nothing? - HUH? Ever? http://theheavystuff.com/?p=68

And, who can you point out that has presented this idea? Have Chem-trails Stopped Global Warming? — I make a real good case for this - has anyone else? http://theheavystuff.com/?p=63

And, here is an idea I’ve covered more than once Could `camera’s’ Be Capturing - or Actualizing - a Virtual Reality? - is anyone else? http://theheavystuff.com/?p=60

Here’s another original idea I covered and should be a new lexicon - Does High Strangeness Overlap Strange Highness? - Get your Strange Highness in one place - right here - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=49

Or, have you ever read, anywhere, of someone suggesting Could the Human Population Level `Trip’ Cosmic Consciousness?- literally suggesting that a QUANTITATIVE answer may be behind an increase in consciousness - if it is occuring or to occur? Didn’t think so. http://theheavystuff.com/?p=47

Or, have you read someone that suggests that Doppelgangers are an escape from death itself? Anywhere? Pilot Doppelgangers - Escaping Death - (Doppelgangers are a favorite THS topic.) http://theheavystuff.com/?p=46

You also rarely read about anyone except Nick Redfern talking about Tulpas - but - even Nick doesn’t go this far - does he? Are Tulpas Everything Esoteric- Find out more about the Tulpa concept here - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=44

But, perhaps the one I am most proud of - my idea that the light seen at death is actually the SUN and an OBE/NDE - find that original stuff elsewhere? Going to the Light at Death - Part 3 - NOPE? http://theheavystuff.com/?p=36

Now, here is an idea I blogged about in 2007 and is NOW becoming more mainstream - Could Orbs be Dead Humans? - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=31

OR, have you ever - anywhere - heard or read someone talking or blogging about The Missing Space of Missing Time Incidents - Nope, only on THS do you find this kind of esoterica - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=25 (my first post that had over 1,000 hits in a day — 4,700 or so is the current most).

And, I’ll let you find out why these titles seem unique - The Six Horizons of Perception http://theheavystuff.com/?p=20 OR Did Houdini Escape Death? - http://theheavystuff.com/?p=18.

Now, hopefully, my mind is not played out - indeed I have 3 posts in reserve just waiting to explode including “Anomalous Realities - The Cosmic Crack” “The Possible Phenomenology Of Fortean Events And Anomalous Realities” and `Local AND Real - or - Realism OR Locality’? I hope you stick around until those become THS later in 2010 too.

I welcome your comments. OH, and PLEASE - go to my front page - unless you do - you don’t even register in my stats. And, on my front page you can see my last 15 posts on THS and the great blogroll for you to check out. Thanks again.

In the last couple of days I’ve been surfing the net, as usual, to find material for my daily AnomalyMan listing on Squidoo. One place I always check out is www.anomalist.com as it’s overall point of view closely matches mine when describing `anomalous’ links of dubious natures. And, it’s two of those links that I have today on my Squidoo webpage (March 27th date) that set off my brain concerning the phenomenology of the ontological structure.

One of the links (all links will be at the bottom of this post) had to do with a MUFON investigator and his recording of a very anomalous `light in the sky at night’ experience that he interprets as Ufo Orbs and their Mothership - and indeed, the link will have pictures that will convince you too that the image explanation could be justified. What’s shown is one brighter light with an apparent connection to another series of `lights’ (different light filters show a golden shaped `interior’ craft).

The other link goes to the story of a serious  gentleman who actively is seeking some answers to the Bigfoot In America saga. And again, this time too, a seeker of the unknown was rewarded with the very thing desired - this time in the form of a 7 foot terrifying `monster’ with a voice which had a bellow beyond belief - and told in a manner that leaves little doubt as to its temporal occurrence to the observer.

So, when I read each of these stories, nearly in order, it set off my brain. Immediately, thoughts like - could `everything’ that is a space — like a human, comb, grass, robin, world, star, atom, — everything — which has a space and has a mass - and that exists IN an ontological structure — everything LIKE that — has one unifing characteristic - it is knowable. VERY KNOWABLE. (Can be measured.)

Then, my mind continued to turn over. Could `everything’ that is UNKNOWN have a space too? A `space’ which can be `called’ to be what it needs to be? To be what it HAS TO BE? (Whatisnotabletontobeis) And, could such `spaces’ only happen (or nearly only happen) when expectations and intentionality’s are raised and/or focused? When the `expectations’ of the `observer’ could trigger the intentionality’s of the `unknown space’?

Hence, MUFON investigators will see Ufo’s. Hence, Bigfoot investigators will see Bigfoots. Hence, Ghost investigators will find Ghosts. And EVP investigators — well, I think you get the idea by now. It seems that the will of the intentionality’s is all that is needed for a Fortean event of an Unknown nature to occur. (Could it be that the `intentionality’s’ come from the unknown when a `possession’ occurs of a human? Does the Unknown have some specific `spooky’ nature to it? A nature different than the Known - which might be `positive’ in some overall balance?)

And, if spirits can be beckoned in this manner (from the unknown) and Ufo’s too can be `beckoned’ — might the `nature’ of these two experiences really be able to be grouped together? Does this justify all the `nutcases’ that claim its the devil who is the ufo’s? (And, of course, this does not rule out nut and bolt ufo’s from existing along with all of us human beings - on our side of reality - in the known - because they have space.) Could this be why Prophet Yahweh could call a `light’ into the sky?

And, really, aren’t scientific discoveries actually similar? A seeker of the unknown - `finds’ the information - that one was seeking as a scientist. Would the `Ufo’s’ and `Bigfoot’s’ BE - information? Information in the rawest form?

A Information or intelligence `representation’  which has expectations and intentionalities? And, could the transfer of those expectations bring a `space’ together with that information base - which might even be able to occur,  and `act’ for a `real temporal’ event. Being infused with `knowledge’ for a moment(s). Being the very display of the unknown.

Hey, thanks for reading - I appreciate your interest - bookmark THS and come back soon for more heavy thoughts. You have seen my FRONT page, right?

Enjoy the two links, and many more, at www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan  - just check March 27th - or see the Ufo-Mufon story at http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0309/ufo-orb.php and the Bigfoot story at http://blogsquatcher.blogspot.com/2009/03/angry-old-man.html.

Hello, and welcome back to The Heavy Stuff (THS) - a blog to bookmark if you want speculation into realities greatest mysteries. Today’s posting is an offshoot of THS’s  post earlier last month http://theheavystuff.com/?p=99 - having to do with just how strange the whole `ufo’ experience can be to an individual or even a group of individuals. It was in that post that THS speculated that occasionally, and perhaps often,  a  `UFO experience’ may involve `different types’ of entities.

THS, when mentioning different entity types,  wasn’t referring about the internet speculation (with some added  fantasy perhaps) that multiple alien races are here, permenantly,  in Earth’s biosphere and are probably interacting with humans (some say dozens of races). No, what THS was and is referring to  is `spaces’* (entities) which do not have an equal `basis’ of `common reality’ grounding - compared to a human. (Wordy, THS knows, but we will get much more specific in a bit.) Let THS attempt to explain:

[* Remember, much of the Phillips Phenomenology (PP) positions `space’ as a characteristic which must be actualized for an event to occur. The PP describes `different types of spaces’ - and where they occur.]

Type One - Aliens/Entities

(Real & Travel In Craft)

Type One Properties —> Real `physical’ alien - in the same manner that a human is `physical’ . A being with a birth, and, on-going, contiguous,  `space-time’ reality - rooted in our same human perceived outer reality that we as humans consider a  `common consensus’ - considered by all to be called our `real’** ontology. Type One Aliens are beings that do NOT exceed the speed of light for travel and are beings that travel by craft. They are beings that do not need to `become objective’ to reveal `their reality of space’. They would be beings as trapped in our common reality as we humans are.

**[In other words, if a class of 100 college biology students were asked in an auditorium classroom if any of them thought the lecture was a `being dreamed’ as opposed to being experienced while awake - all would KNOW it wasn’t a dreamstate. (Then again with college students who knows, right?)]

Comment - To humans at our 2009 level of consciousness, these Type One Aliens are the most real and `humanlike’  of all alien types. `They’ will probably have arms, legs, a head, be able to communicate with each other - etc - humanlike characteristics of which humans can identify. Nevertheless, `aliens’ of any sort are inherently scary to most humans, of course.

However, type one beings that travel `anywhere’ in the universe ONLY below the speed of light - can be assumed to be rare; very rare - in ANY one particular location, including Earth. That said, being very rare - in a near infinite universe - does not mean non-existent or impossible. Indeed, while of low probability to be at any one location in the universe - this would be the alien/entity type MOST likely to have an interest in living planets like Earth.

But, would such beings, Type One beings,  be so focused as `being here’ only in the last 60 years? (Or would it be another type of the four entity/alien choices THS will review?) Wouldn’t such type one beings be just as likely to have been here, around Earth, for at least the last few hundred million years? You know, coming and going at will over the millenia - perhaps staying on occasion for eons.

Could we really expect that more than a  handful would be `around’ in any given era like ours? (If they did `stick around’ how many `aliens’ would they need to have a sustainable population?) Could we really expect a huge increase within a short period of 60 years, that we seem to have experienced,  from beings that use  `moving craft’ in a `galaxy’ context? (If there has been such an increase in the last 60 years.)

Indeed, the idea of a sudden increase in `this type’ of alien - a type one alien/entity - just seems unlikely, logically. Why? Well, first, T1 beings living below the `light threshold’ would not even have knowledge of mans recent advancements - outside of a 60 year light cone. Could there really be a significant number of civilizations within 60 years that have humanlike entities that have crafts that go a significant % of the speed of light? And who would want to come HERE if they did have such `slow’ `interstellar’ craft? It simply seems unlikely.

———————–

All that stated, doesn’t it seem possible that a few - repeat, a few - species of aliens may be camped out semi-permanently on Earth or nearby planets (if they do have near light-speed craft)?It does to THS - but - at the same time - it also seems logical that there AREN’T - large numbers of different types. We can all quibble about what constitues a large number  within a 60 year radius or permanent level of visitation on all `live planets’ in the universe. (Meaning that other planets with planet and animal life would be just as likely as Earth to have monitoring `type one’ aliens.)

It might be a cool blog post to speculate `how many’ craftable alien civilazations might be within any given 100 mile light year `radius’? Why? Because if an entity had access to the universe `above’ the speed of light — there exists little reason to `limit’ oneself to the `local’ 60 light year light cone. Which leads us to the next logical type of entity:

Type Two - Aliens/Entities

(Real and Travel Without Craft)

Type Two Properties –> Real physical alien - in the same manner as a human is physical and the type one alien. A being with a birth and an on-going `space-time’ reality - rooted in a common consensus with similar beings on a planet with a real ontology - just like humans and type one aliens. Beings that can EXCEED the speed of light for travel and do NOT travel by `craft/structure’ in the strict sense of the word. Beings that `become objective’ to reveal their reality on Earth. (Obviously, the `how’ part of this is the `science’ side - or - `consciousness’ side — the esoteric aspect. On the science side, perhaps humans/aliens/beings can create machines that can be `stepped into’ and as the outcome - provide `bi-location’ for the `space identity’. On the consciousness side - perhaps some beings with intelligence on some planet somewhere have been able to develop - just thru `mind’ focus — an ability to travel the universe — and in essence - `plant’  their `space’ elsewhere/elsewhen. To THS, both of these `new location experiences’ - would seem to be within the rhelm of possibility if the concept of `dopplegangers’ is real. If there is a `space’ which can `be representative’ within `another reality’ (not connected by the light cone to the original now) - then the `doppleganger’ may be just the `vehicle’ needed. IT WOULD ALSO EXPLAIN THE MANY MANY TIMES THAT ALIENS HAVE BEEN SAID TO JUST `VANISH’. Because, it’s not really `their space’ that is here at all. It would be like having perception from an out of body experience taken to the 10th degree. Frankly, it, this explanation, would also account for the great variety of `beings’ - indeed, those of type two that are more rooted in `science’ travel — may be limited in the way that they can `appear’ based on some specific `programming’ - ones `space’ could appear as perhaps an animal or non-similar entity that was originating the `signal’.

Comment - To humans in 2009 at our collective consciousness levels - these `forms’ or alien/entities - are perhaps the most mysterious - as they seem to be possibly `more real’ than `more spiritual entites - like Type 3 & 4′ (which we will cover soon). WHY? Because things that seem totally solid, totally here - and then can vanish — does not fit our normal consensus reality. Is this how a Bigfoot can be within 20 feet of a human and compel that human to search to find a `real Bigfoot’ - again - for the rest of their lives? Or, how `beings’ or entities can come out of, or go into, a `glowing slot’ of space - as seen on the Bigelow Ranch.

Doesn’t it seem likely that many of the experiences that are described as paranormal are really an encounter with these `enhanced’ Type Two creatures? Doesn’t this really seem to describe much of what is taken to be UFO’s - speeding away at unbelievable’ speeds? Indeed, if we are ready to be honest as thinking humans - this type to alien - literally from a different world with a `common now’ (meaning the alien or entities world does exist as a planet within our timecone) and `common spaces’ to our Earth — seems to be the `main type of alien/entity’ that we as humans have encounters. That is, if we base the `population’ on the actual number of `high strangeness - close encounters’. (Certainly, there are more `lights in the sky’ stories. Remember, lights in the sky stories are a dime a dozen and could involve machines or crafts built by humans within the governments and militarys of the world.)

Key characteristic of Type Two alien/entity — `travel’ of being is accomplished by `structure’ of temporarily increased consciousness level or `increase’ in space bi-location via some `science’ methodology that enhances that ability of bi-locate. For the entity that `travels’ the travel is temporary and `not’ the `normal state’ for such a being.

Type Three - Aliens/Entities

(`Real’, Travel without Craft, Do NOT Live On Any `Planet’ Surface)

These beings are `real’ in `quotation marks’ - and do not appear `as real’ (solid - in a quantitative sense) as the many close up sightings of legendary creatures such as a Bigfoot (a Type Two creature). That said, they may be viewed as appearing in any `shape’ from an Orb to a `translucent’ or ghost like being — ie - an entity that doesn’t appear `solid’ - and appears to have a light basis. Somehow, a human that encounters such a `being’ `knows’ that it isn’t real in our normal sense — and furthermore - doesn’t seem to be able to have a `permanent time’ within our reality common consensus. These beings/aliens/entities seem to be operating on the energy from the local environment.

While it’s possible that these entities see `themselves’ in some on-going manner - it’s equally likely that - these entities have NO on-going consciousness of their own space. There is no reason that both types may be part of Type Three. But, even for `spaces/entities’ that see themselves in an on-going manner — it’s hard to believe that these `spaces’ were ever `born’ or that they `live’ on a planet. Indeed, these type of `spaces’ seem `very local’ and very temporal - probably distorting the very localness and temporalness of common consensus that humans live within on Earth.

Indeed, these seem to be the creatures of `our own making’ - mythology -  and iconic shapes and feelings - that can form into temporary `translucent’ type of `solids’. The land of angels as a possible origin for this type of entity also. For, if these are not `super-local’ specialized consensus events, then - they must be `timeless’ beings that permeate everything. These are the `Godlike’ `guardian’ type entities that Mr. Bledsoe reported (my recent post covers this - http://theheavystuff.com  - and that many many people have reported over the years). Likewise, Mr. Bledsoe also reported entities (translucent) with glowing red eyes — this also would be a Type Three entity.

These type three entities are perhaps the most frightening to humans (with good reason) — as they appear to be powerful `locally’. These spaces seem to be part of the human condition encountered by only a few. The limited number of `possessions’ would seem to fall into this category in general. Entities `built’ by the dilemma of the human condition of needing to embrace despair.

Type Four - Aliens/Entities

(`Real’, Travel without Craft, Human based - alive and dead)

This type of entity is very similar to Type Three except that it has a `singular human’ basis - either `prior’ or `current’ - as opposed to Type Three being a more `common consensus space’ with energy generally supplied by living humans. Indeed, Type Four entities could often be thought of as Ghosts or in the most extreme rare circumstance `a real doppelganger’. These entities would tend to visit or at least be most perceivable to  humans or places they `knew’ when alive.

While poltergeist events can be scary - often `visits’ from these entities are spiritually uplifting and not frightening. And, unless `called’ these entities seem to be short lived and infrequent to often being a just `one time showing’ after death - to a loved one — and often only in a symbolic manner or in a dreamstate.

Nevertheless, most humans consider the Type Four entity to be real and of our very essence - even beyond our own humanness. Indeed, type four entities give the human race hope that we are more than just our physical bones - and thoughts - and that we too - may be connected to the entities of our universe that can travel.

Make sure to visit our squidoo page too. www.squidoo.com/anomalies  - thanks.

Hello fellow mind surfers looking to consume your daily dose of brain food from the internet. As The Heavy Stuff (THS) has told you before, THS gets it’s inspiration often from the websites you find on our blogroll. One example of the brain food in 2008 has been anomalist.com’s consistent linking to a new blog which often delves into the quagmire of `reality talk’ - and - this is just an example link of the material of this excellent thinker Bruce Duensing http://materialintangible.blogspot.com/2008/04/part-two-quantum-subjectivity-and.html#links

And now you know that it can make your eyes glaze over too - sometimes even encountering an article title like Part Two: Quantum Subjectivity and The Holographic Model. can make the brain freeze.

It is also true as you know that anomalist.com (and others) take a chance with this blogs more esoteric posts - especially posts which include phenomenology thoughts. So, when THS felt it was time to wade once again into the murky subjective waters of `experiencing reality’ - whether by our eyesight - or with `objective recording devices’ such as video cameras and other technology - THS wanted to show via Bruce’s writing just how nebulous it all can be.

The Heavy Stuff also feels that our phenomenology - avoids alot of the unknown physics of speculation - and ultimately is a simpler explanation for the basic description that simulates our real reality that we experience. Simulates you ask? If you look at THS’s blog postings recently - (upper right corner of front page of this website) - you can read more about how THS feels that reality is simulated instantaneously, continuously.

But, today’s mind excursion is to a subject we have covered before `Paranormal Videos - Dubious or Amazing’ — this was the link http://theheavystuff.com/?p=22.

And, if you read THS’s posting, one of the main points was about the `seeming increase’ in videos about all things paranormal - which THS felt was largely a matter of numbers. More folks with more cameras and more security cameras. Indeed, those with an interest in the paranormal should EXPECT there would be more. And, there will be even more in the future. Perhaps so many more as to challenge our very notions about reality.

THS also makes the point in the posting that the sheer quantity of `impossible’ videos (of ghosts, ufo’s) could make the impossible seem less miraculous - especially in light of video and computer capabilities of the 2000’s. Since anything can be faked; who’s to say that an unfaked video is special ———- nobody. But, again, as THS makes clear in the post - the paranormal (ghosts, ufo’s) have been captured `on devices’ long before the great advances in graphic capabilities.

But, back to the title of this posting - and looking at it thru the phenomenology THS has been describing over the past year to our dear readers. ` Could `camera’s’ be Capturing or Actualizing - a Virtual Reality?

Remember, THS phenomenology, the Phillips Phenomenology, describes `space’ as Not-able-to-be and `time’ as Able-to-Not-be. More specifically, the phenomenology says that both are really descriptions of SPACE. (Or, types of space(s)).

Science tells us today that `space’ - empty space - the kind without matter (remember our universe averages one atom per cubic yard) is `filled with virtual particals’. Virtual particles that don’t actualize. Virtual particles that don’t actualize in places with no matter. (That said, virtual particles exist and surround matter too.)

Virtual particles that are not observed and don’t actualize in places with no matter. Does that describe nothingness?

If you are familiar with phenomenology - perhaps one of the greatest issues is Being and Nothingness. Most phenomenologists would like to infuse space with Beingness - giving Beingness to matter. Nothingness, in this case, would be Everything Not Now. Only now would be infused with realness; with Being, to most phenomenology ideas.

Others humans who play with words would look at the reality issue as subjectivity or objectivity. Others would look at reality as a divide between what is known and what is unknown. Others as space - time. Or Ying-Yang. You get the idea, right? Two `phases’.

But, THS asks you — doesn’t Able-to-Not-be — something that ISN’T (this) space — describe TIME? And, if you are a follower of THS phenomenology, that time and space — the able to not be and the not able to be — combine — to form our reality of not-able-to-not-be?

Our completely determined reality of Not-Able-To-Not-Be. Our moment to moment, real.

And, that dear readers, brings us back to HOW the paranormal can gain a foothold in our observable reality. WHAT cameras may be capturing or actualizing when `filming’ recording - the paranormal.

First, by definition, the paranormal isn’t Normal. Isn’t of things that exist on a continuing ontological basis with matter. And, by this very definition ———– exist of things that ARE able-to-not-be.

Ghosts are able-to-not-be. That is THEIR space. Their space is `able-to-not-be’. —- And, folks, — the able to not be is part of our real reality. Virtual reality can easily be described as a `able-to-not-be’ reality - right? (Armchair physicists gather close.)

But, our HUMAN perception, generally, isn’t focused on the virtual reality. Humans do much `better’ (getting money, having friends, doing tasks) focusing on the `real’ - the real `things with spaces’ around us. NOT on the `things’ less dependent on that phase of space. Things that may exist virtually. Things that may `be’ able to not be - part of our common consensus observational reality. Beyond our sight expectations.

But, cameras are not human consciousness. And cameras, or other devices which can monitor `reality’, - thru their self-contained observation — could be capturing parts of reality below the threshold of common consensus. Or, even actualized parts of reality below the threshold of common human consensus. (Actualized in the sense of recording.)

Isn’t it possible that `ghosts live’ in the able-to-not-be?

Could `orbs’ be tulpas of dead humans? A manifestation of the able-to-not-be — on a temporary basis.

Could ghosts be full or partial orbs?

Don’t doppelgangers define able-to-not-be?

Don’t Bigfoot creatures seem to be in the able-to-not-be?

Wouldn’t the future and the past be in the able-to-not-be? (Actually the past would be in the Not-able-to-not-be.) (And if the past AND the future is in the able-to-not-be; that would allow past dead spirits of humans to be capable of making it to the present via the `future’.)

Finally, with that thought in mind — couldn’t the able-to-not-be have gradients? With some `things’ or `events’ more likely than other `things’ or `events’? Perhaps some `things’ are more real than others in the able-to-not-be. (Just like on this side?)

Could, for example, Ufo’s be becoming `more real’?

Perhaps the paranormal `thing’ can be generated from the `human end’ of thought. Sort of like a sweeping light of consciousness lighting up the filaments of the able-to-not-be. Lighting up the filaments of the possible. Bringing the unknown into the known. Bringing virtual to real. But, perhaps, only a camera is needed as the observing tool; and, not human consciousness.

Or, perhaps the ` paranormal thing  on video’ is NOT generated by humans. Perhaps the `things’ of the able-to-not-be `space’ have their own basis of existence. One not dependent upon our structure in the Not able to be. But a reality that `overlaps’ ours. One that has intentionality’s on THAT side. Over in the able-to-not-be.

Please visit THS’s squidoo site at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman for more thought provoking links.

Recently I had this link  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=469849&in_page_id=1879      on  my Aug. 6th posting in my www.squidoo.com/anomalymanlens (squidoo.com hosts free one page websites) - in summary, it’s about a man who became obsessed with the `glowing white orbs’ that sometimes can be seen in everyday photographs. The article goes into painstaking detail about how the gentleman became obsessed with the white dots and the methodology he used to `prove’ that orbs even had `characteristics’ - including the ability to be `called’ into a photo - and - only `appearing’ on one of two camera shots taken simultaneously. (Some say that UFO’s can be called even.) The Heavy Stuff thinks that this man makes a convincing case that `some space with intelligence’ is displaying itself to the camera shutter. But, is that intelligence that of a dead human? Please - make sure to read the story via my Anomalies, Paranormal and Mind Perceptions `lens’ hosted on Squidoo.com. and then return for the rest of the heavy thoughts.

Welcome back. Now that you have read about this mans impressive efforts to pin down the `orbs’ seen in pictures - I want to bring the discussion again to the various `proofs’ I have been blogging about concerning the survival of `death’ and the way that phenomena is being `expressed’ and then `recorded’ by our `science-technology’ of today - such as tape recorders, cameras and video cameras. After all, all that mankind is desiring is for `some aspect’ of our `life’ to continue - after death. If even a smidgen of `space’ that we have in life continues - and that smidgen of `space’ can be proven in some manner - then the science of today’s technology may go a long way to calm the seeking mind regarding one of the biggest personal issues in reality.

Indeed, what seems to be happening, to those with an open mind about these various phenomena that the Heavy Stuff has been blogging about, is that `some communication’ between the `living’ and the `dead’ is able to occur — and it seems that the direct event-horizon between the two spheres - can be influenced by intentionality’s from `both sides’. Let me summarized what I am trying to express.

First, `the findings’ suggest a range of how much `intentionalities’ matter. From our living side - the `recorder’ can be as impartial as the junkyard video security camera picking up a `ghost’ coming to `look’ at the car one died in that same evening. (As readers know, I have blogged about such a video and the video can be seen at www.squidoo.com/theheavystuff) The video camera is simply recording the `space-time’ it actualizes/records — the wrecker yard ghost is not intentionally `performing’ for the camera to show `life in the great beyond’. It is simply an event-horizon `event’ that is accessible to a passive recording device. And, as readers of the Heavy Stuff know — the same can be said of `ghosts’ that show up in humanish form in photographs - an event that has happened many times over the last two centuries. However, this photographic event - seems to have `some’ intentionality from `the other side’ being-space. After all, they DO have to get into position for the photograph and `display an identifiable human space’ for recording. And, we also know that the same `unintentional’ pick up of human spaces with voice capability seems to happen on blank tapes at times called EVP. (It could be said again that EVP may involve intentionality from the other side.)

But, we also know that each of these seemingly `random’ contact events from the `other side’ seem to be able to be `forced’ to occur at a level far more than chance events would allow.  I’ve blogged here already about Harry Houdini’s coded message for his wife that he seemed to be able to `get thru’ during sittings with mediums that were conducted and  specifically called for that very reason - the very definition of an intentionality. And, firm intentionality’s on both sides were able to impart specific pre-agreed upon information from the other side to our side. There was belief on both sides that the effort-intentionality’s would succeed.

I’ve also blogged about the Leslie Flint recordings during which `voices’ of the dead `came thru’ — once again to a medium in a setting –`expecting contact and expecting information’. In this instance the Leslie Flint recordings were made for the the `space-intentionality’s of the other side’ to come thru to indicate and  voice `how’ the afterlife was `for them - for their specific space’. Much of the information that these `dead persons’ `said’ was how the afterlife is a state of mind and similar like minds- and that each state is a different `level’ - with further development of ones state of mind possible (even in the afterlife). IF true, it sounds a bit like what the eastern religions have been saying for centuries. (Would those in the afterlife LIE about conditions there? - Naw. LOL.)

That said, if you listen to the tapes - and I highly recommend it - the `dead’ beings indicated they were `still human’ - still looked human (but saw some folks they knew at ages they were surprised to see the person represented as being - meaning - one might know someone into their 60’s - they die - you see them in the afterlife as who they were when they were 20 - and you don’t recognize them at first). They also indicated that they still did `Earthly things’ - such as the bricklayer who still worked with bricks `just as real bricks as on your side’ and built things that people wanted - and this was done with other `dead’ bricklayers who the subject might have known or not known on earth. Somehow, our remaining `space’ after we die can `create’ or experience this full range of `doing’ the intentionality’s we often did on earth while living. Lighting up those fibers of existence so to speak.

And, I’ve also blogged about the extraordinary `events’ of the Ghosts of Flight 401. In these events — those from the other side, the pilots, were evidently able to `project’ that `dead virtual-space’ into the real reality we all agree upon does NOT include dead spaces. In essence, REAL GHOSTS, with full perceivable spaces - in the event-horizon ——– that, as described by witnesses - disappeared in a `pop of light’ - literally vanishing in front of alive folks eyes. Unfortunately, these events of the pilots of flight 401 were not recorded on film.

To The Heavy Stuff, it does not take a great leap of intellect to see the possible connection between the `spaces’ of the pilots that `re-appeared’ and the occasionally recorded instances of a doppelganger. Indeed, doppelganger’s seem to be the same entity but in reverse - a ghostly form of a living person. To think that the doppelganger is the same virtual-space-identity after we die - is not a big leap of intellect either. Could we all be exploring the real reality right now with our virtual space within the doppelganger we all have? Could we take the representation of our space `elsewhere’ such as the reports of `remote viewing’? Would our living doppelganger be the `lucid body’ we have during lucid dreaming? Where does this virtual space that the living have - come from? Is it already a part of our real space — that isn’t part of the real reality to begin with?

Remember how the Heavy Stuff has talked about `spaces’ within the Heavy Stuff’s ideas on phenomenology? The Heavy Stuff’s position is that `our personal space’ — the real one that has a duration and `runs off’ with our appearance of space to other spaces — is NOT part of the `run off’ of appearances. Our real space is NOW only to us -  the space of our appearance is PAST (to us - in our real space) just as all other spaces (people, pencils, bedpans, etc) are PAST to us (as it takes time for the light that bounces off their real space to reach our eyes/perception). The Heavy Stuff goes further and posits that `space-itselfs’ main attribute is that `it’ `space’ is NOT ABLE TO BE. It is that attribute, sequentially, that describes `what space IS’. All we living folk hope for - for us to continue into the `afterlife’ - is for our own NOT ABLE TO BE to continue at some level. From our own space is where we will find our perception ability and continued intentionality’s.

But, events such as a doppelganger or the `real ghosts’ of flight 401 are extraordinarily rare - to the point of being only anecdotal - but represent, perhaps just what may be ultimately possible for `spaces’ that still have an identity with a specific human form-space. Indeed, it is nearly certain that the virtual-space we have after death is quite small - virtually unseeable perhaps to the naked eye - perhaps nothing more than a `real’ virtual particle. Perhaps just part of the virtual spaces that are all around us and are a significant part of the real reality in which we living spaces reside.

 And, once again, as I have blogged before, these `virtual-spaces outside of reality’s consensus’ somehow actualize when recorded via devices such as cameras and recording tapes.

It’s important to remember that estimates by science are that 60-120 billion humans have lived and died on earth since mankinds rise - if we have a virtual space after death - some of those billions may still be hanging around humans even today. Indeed, while pure speculation - I have a new link of a video on the internet, again on my anomalies site, of an ORBlike light coming out of a babies mouth (seeable thru the camera’s eyepiece too). Could that be the way a soul enters a body? Could a body be-have a number of `souls’? Or, is that just the freedom that might exist for orbs - free to go anywhere.

Perhaps orbs are the few beings that die that have transcended the `material state of minds’ that is the virtual afterlife for most spaces. Perhaps orbs are conscious spaces that have intentionality’s or can be influenced by intentionality’s of living spaces. Influenced to perhaps show up in pictures, strangely. To communicate that the orb space is not a film miscue but a real entity with continued space. Joyously dancing in the development of the film - to communicate that `our space’ - the part of us that has always been - NOT ABLE TO BE - continues - at least at some level - and with some level of intelligence.

Today on my lens at www.squidoo.com/anomalymanI posted a link I found to a UFO video supposedly made of a `massive UFO show’ in Peru on May 20th - the video is part of a newscast of the event - you will find the link under the two posted for today June 6th. Also, in the video, the comparison is made to the Mexico City event which indeed looked/looks very similar to this recent event in Peru. Meaning, lots and lots of `ufo lights’ in the sky — dozens of ufo light-spaces. Supposedly, the `Ufo’s’ stayed in the sky for a very extended period and were widely seen. Is this just a continuation of the Protocol Sequences required before disclosure of alien presence — the build-up of a series of irrefutable proof events - seemingly, at times, to be under acceleration? Instead of `dozens’ will the next time bring `hundreds’ - or - would a civilization being approached via a build-up in `irrefutable events’ be `scared’ by a show of hundreds (of craft - or just lights)? Is it a balancing act?

Indeed, will video `proof’ ever be taken as real proofby today’s skeptical society - that has seen it all and heard it all from the government and news-maker talking heads? Will the increase in video cameras thruout the world and the more frequent recording of the impossible paraNormal — make the `impossible’ dismissible by the media because —– like any photo — any video can be faked nowadays? And, where does that leave the UNFAKED paranormal captures on video - or - what indeed are we to make of them.

Any follower of the paranormal has seen `Ghost Movies’ since the days of shaky hand held films of the 50’s and onward - not many — but ghosts had been captured on film — even `ghosts’ not seen by the naked eye while filming. Somehow, even those 1950 video cameras (super 8 films etc) had some quality of being able to record `hidden space appearances’ that our eye does not record. Nowadays, even on this blog — I’ve mentioned and had links to `Ghost videos’ - some made by security video tapes in the middle of the night —- UFO’s have also been captured on these type of set-ups.

Perhaps it’s just me — but — to me — it’s more likely that the non-human security cameras are capturing a viewable reality than not. The ghosts that are being seen on these cameras — just as the ufo’s being seen on today’s link — are real. And, indeed, are amazing. I believe all this regardless if the videos could be produced by bigtime studios or rich folk who wish to divert humanities interests. Frankly, it is THAT that I don’t believe — that the world is full of fakes trotting out laughable material. The fact that paraNormal events are being captured more is only logical with more people and more cameras — it does not make it less likely or more likely that these events are happening - just that more are being seen — as `more of reality is being recorded on video’ — Could it be that the video recording is actualizing marginal events below normal observation?

And, that brings me to a link I had on my lens about two months ago — and which is dated April 4th — http://www.metacafe.com/watch/200758/flying_creature/ it is a heck of a video —- and pushes the very edge of what the marginal events below the actualization of `observable reality’ might be. Could the `shadow’ virtual world of particles - contain - event spaces — such as mythical creatures and is this the capturing of one on film?

Finally, a few words about this blog — 4,500 visitors in March and 7,000 since — sometimes hundreds a day because of listings on great websites like www.anomalist.com and www.thedailygrail.comand more. I will continue to try to do my best to highlight issues less noted by others and to try to bring the best in speculation on the paraNormal from a phenomenology perspective. Thanks for reading - leave a comment.

Recently, anomalist.com sent me to a site that I poked around some. That in itself is nothing unusual - as it is one of my enjoyments to poke around and bring the best stuff to my `Squidoo’ lens at www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan . Indeed, you will find this and 3 other `ghost videos’ from the same site on my lens - anyway - this is the link I’d like you to see most if you haven’t went to my site and viewed all four http://www.yourghoststories.com/ghost-pictures-videos/oklahoma-wrecker.php    but - come right back.

Ok - now that you’ve went to my site, or the other, and saw the videos - what do you think? Interestingly, the `ghost’ angle to the media is seemingly almost `off-limits’. One rarely sees the mainstream TV media do these types of stories except during ratings sweeps. And, while they don’t `snicker’ quite as much when `reporting’ Ghost Stories as they do when `reporting’ Bigfoot or Ufo stories - they rarely take the subject of ghosts into the `heavy area’.

What I mean by that is that the media loves to cover this angle of the story via `Ghost Hunters with scientific equipment to back them up’. Invariably, the `reporter’ will hear the anomalous voice - or - will feel the dip in air temperature representative of the ghost. The reporter will leave the story in just about that positioning for the `listener’ to make up their own mind.

What shallow gobbledygook the media makes us endure. How about asking the `heavy’ questions with real depth that folks might ultimately care about? How about asking the questions that tie these videos into religious teachings? `Life’ after death is no small matter left `answered’ with the geek with some electrometer in his or her hand.

So, lets look at some `heavy issues’ associated with this video and the others at the site (again - the best 4 are on MY squidoo lens). The first `issue’ I would like to raise is that all of these videos were `captured’ using a technology that can record frequencies beyond the normal human - not saying that they were - but, a video camera can be adapted with many types of filters. Evidently some that can also see some spirit frequencies at least occasionally. So, while some `normal folks’ do occasionally see `white spirits’ — these four videos supposedly are not necessarily `recording’ what is also `seen’ - but are recording the beyond in every sense of the word.

But, what is the evidence that `somethings dead spirit’ is being recorded? Frankly, it’s the link I provided above — to me, it’s beyond explainable that a dead spirit would `show up’ in a `wrecker yard’ like that and move like that. I fully believe that that persons `dead space’ was indeed in that wrecker yard (but not necessarily their `dead time’ - which was still in their dead body at the scene or hospital).

It is also very unusual to me that this videos’ dead person `appears nearly solid’ compared to the other 3 videos of ghosts. Could it be more obvious that `the less dead one is — the more `solid’ ones remaining `dead space’ IS? And, that, conversely, `old dead spaces’ are rare; very rare (in comparison to the fact that from 65-120 billion humans have already lived and died) indeed.

BUT, THAT DOES NOT RULE THEM OUT, ESPECIALLY IN ENCLOSED `HAUNTED’ SPACES - with a history of their own. Yes, I am speaking of the `physical setting’ (such as in the various haunted History Museums, or still existing abandoned prison facilities, etc) - the `house’ so to speak. Personally, I think the `dead space’ does interact with the `real’ spaces of the house in real time. This of course leads to the meter readers going wild of the ghostbusters — just like they are supposed to.

But, what are the REAL ISSUES that the media would need to examine if `all this ghost business’ were to be `taken seriously’. To me, they don’t take it deeper because of the media bias to `protect religion traditional beliefs’. Frankly, the religions don’t really `favor’ ghosts — even if it is proof of ones `space’ continuing. So, why doesn’t religion, and therefore the mainstream TV media, jump on this — simple — one is supposed to go to that wonderful reward that religion offers - heaven. Hanging out in a museum forever — or - in a parking facility — or even a wrecker yard ————— IS NOT HEAVEN. And therefore, requires THEM (the religious) to provide the reason for `ghost videos’ being real — the media is hardly going to take a ghost video into a convent and ask the nuns what do they think. Indeed, with a snicker and a `to the next story mentality’ — other `serious’ issues are raised by the existence of ghost videos that they, the mainstream media ignores. Most notably the super important issue of`life after death’. Our very existence. Not even that is important enough for the media to take seriously - after all — spiffer has a new mop coming out soon.

And, that `issue’ (Life After Death) the media `handles’ `scientifically’ with the likes of Sylvia Browne or the occasional `hard science’ of Out Of Body Experiences and the comparison of those to `what is reported’ by those who have `died’ and came back to tell it. And, for me, that fits right into one of my few original esoteric thoughts (pats on back, while figuring someone will say someone else thought of it first) I’ve had in my lifetime.

Here’s that thought — We do indeed go into the light. We do indeed go into the `brightest light’ in this part of the universe. We do indeed go into the `light’ which brings life to this planet. We do indeed go into the `light’ when we do something in our `death space’ that we could never do in our `life space’. We do indeed go into the brightest light within 100 trillion miles - we go into the SUN. Our sun.

Think about it. Your entire life has contained one absolute forbidden thing to do — look at the sun directly. It is something you have never done. Never. Almost, no one has ever done it.

That is, until one dies. If indeed our `dead space’ separates from our `alive space of our body’ — and IF indeed, in this `out of body’ experience one has `perception abilities’ from that space — then, I speculate that the `dead space’ would almost naturally `look’ at the sun — and be drawn to it; especially within the period of a few days. Drawn to its all encompassing beauty that one has never observed directly before - and only can be experienced at the time of death.

And, perhaps, that is really IT - and where the `missing 95 billion ghosts are’ (save for a few; and those may be just temporary such as the wrecker yard ghost whose was probably just confirming her own death). They are in the SUN - and, in my opinion where we are all likely to end up.