Recently, fellow blogger Bruce Duensing did a `heavy post’ about the actualization conversion of reality – and how it could involve `imagination’. Bruce also pointed out how the nature of awareness itself would put ones placement in some sort of flow to make it that ones reality is little more than a representation of a real - real.
If we consider imagination as a transient force with properties we do not fully understand in relation to unknown atmospheric phenomenon, is this force, a manifold between the mind, the physical properties of mass, and the organization of energy?
For us all of reality is a bio neurological simulation that is representative of imaging in various forms from pain to vision to taste to.. ..the list is endless.This crucial system of coordinating internally and externally a balance of maintainability through imaging, perhaps could be termed as it’s root, imagination.
From this context of application, one could say we imagine reality.
Excerpt from http://materialintangible.blogspot.com/2011/11/mass-and-energy-is-imagination.html.
As always, nearly every word of the above post of Bruce’s carries worthwhile thoughts to process. And, of course, other thinkers have delved into this area of thought; – that we `imagine reality’, or at least a part of it. And, THE HEAVY STUFF is not here to strain the point – but to provide yet another view of the same `space of reality’ that Bruce is referring to IMO.
Specifically, it’s the `run off’ area of the REAL NOW.
The real spaces that have mass and that are in `light’ conditions (also spaces not in equilibrium with the reality that isn’t their space – such as body temperature, etc.) and are in proximity to other spaces – ie: human bodies, chairs, trees and so on.
Indeed, you’ve probably never thought about it but all of our `local spaces’ create a condition that is NOT COMMON – if we are to look at our overall reality — our real universe — most of which is `empty space’ and devoid of `objects within shared spaces’.
Indeed, `shared spaces’ are so rare in the universe as a `type of space’ – that one could almost assume that such spaces may have special properties about their phenomenology —– perhaps.
Indeed, almost immediately Duensing’s post also says:
The holographic principle is a mathematical principle that the total information contained in a volume of space corresponds to an equal amount of information contained on the boundary of that space
And, with all due respect – what Bruce is describing IMO is Husserls `running off phenomena’ – literally the `Diagram Of Time’ graphic found on this page – http://books.google.com/books?id=muKMVuIY4tsC&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29&dq=The+Continua+of+Running-Off+Phenomena&source=bl&ots=PSjrXLnij_&sig=0jQWQZ-XfzGPPpFUXfZI9yQkAKE&hl=en&ei=-73STsmSIoKWtwfJqe34Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&sqi=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=The%20Continua%20of%20Running-Off%20Phenomena&f=false
And, also below from his original notes:
In simple words, the graph shows that the `now’ is comprised of a `series’ of points that are falling back, sinking down, running off, within the confines of a space of equal measure and representation. Now, look closely at the graph – as The GRAPH SHOWS that a series of NOWS may be filled with DIFFERENT (other) OBJECTS (remember, this is all within the SAME INSTANT – THE NOW).
The above graph SHOWS what duration IS.
And, using the Phillips Phenomenology – I hope to show that `that area’ (the upper right hand corner) is where the `slippery slope of the time-cone exists’ – literally.
In the Phillips Phenomenology (PP) – the `box’ of now that Husserl describes in his Diagram of Time – includes the idea that the `area with possible other objects’ – is actually the `on-going’ `able-to-not-be’ PORTION of EVERY NOW. That is what is up in the `corner’ of the run-off.
That is what is facing the NON-NOW – (that also INCLUDES btw part of the real to come – and – part of the `real’ that never occurred, in addition to real imagination).
That upper right corner – as noted, also includes mans and mankind’s consciousness – as a part of the space of the now that is now replicating (normally) with the `mass objects’ of ordinary consensus. The chairs and world and people, etc.
And, that upper right corner, includes `events’ that can `play out as part of the now itself’. IMO.That right corner phenomena – rarely occurs in the `real world’ – BUT – occasionally……does occur.
BUT, while it can occur, and BE `real’ within our ontological structure temporarily (think ghosts, ufos, dopplegangers, bigfoots) – it (that upper right area) doesn’t have a basis of `event stability mass’ to retain its realness for anything other than a determined limited `time-cone’ of running-off phenomena – within the able-to-not-be – portion of our personal, common and shared realities..
That upper right portion of the graph – the able to not be space – in the PP – is also `where the real now’ has a final `one time counted’ representation. As it is `shoved aside’ by the new NOT Able To Be (what a NOW actually IS to an individual space).
Remember, the `now to collective spaces’ is called the Not Able To Not Be in the Phillips Phenomenology. The determined. Ultimately represented by the `spaces with mass’ and what those spaces perceive other spaces to `be’.
This upper right `able to not be’ – is a slippery slope that may also allow `intentional contact’ with `outside able-to-not-be’ spaces IMO. The literal portal – or porthole – into `other conciousness’ – that includes – all kinds of entities.
IMO, some of these entities can be `stimulated’ via `imagination’ as Bruce refers to it – or intentionalities, or expectations. These `actions’ within the able to not be – stimulate the perception structures IMO on occasion.
But, importantly, I want to stress that nothing would prohibit – direct intentionalities `FROM THE OTHER SIDE’ either.
Allowing for the possibilities of something like `Ouija board contact’ – EVP listening devices – hypnotic states of involvement with `higher entities’ – `abductions by aliens’ – `being shown an apocalyptic future’ – `knowing information about another space or location’ — YES ALL OF THE so-called ParaNormal.
And, all described by a different form of space within the real now.
PS – want to see something real interesting – the same graph above is used to describe a note of a tone. http://www.popular-musicology-online.com/issues/04/Aho/Diagram%202.jpg
The below book is literally my bible – read at your own risk of ending up writing `articles’ like this: lol. As you can see, the book got placed elsewhere – still check it out.